From: doko@debian.org 
  
 On 9/13/25 12:08, Santiago Vila wrote: 
 > On Sat, Sep 13, 2025 at 01:37:54PM +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: 
 >> On Sat, Sep 13, 2025 at 01:52:06PM +0900, Simon Richter wrote: 
 >>>> Hm, seems to be gcc, specifically cc1, cc1plus and lto1, so this is 
 >>>> less of an issue for the base system as well. 
 >>> 
 >>> Ah, known issue: #1113931 
 >> 
 >> Somebody asks this every time unstripped gcc is uploaded :) 
 > 
 > Maybe because most of us still expect packages uploaded for unstable 
 > to be suitable for release, which an unstripped gcc is not. 
 > 
 > Matthias Klose wrote: 
 >> It allows to get the complete stack traces in case of internal 
 >> compiler errors. 
 > 
 > An archive rebuild was made with gcc-15 in unstable, and no traces of 
 > internal compiler error was found. 
  
 yes, amd64 only. That leaves six unchecked architectures. 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)