From: joerg@debian.org 
  
 On 17692 March 1977, M. Zhou wrote: 
  
 >> > So any previous FTPMaster delegation is still in force, as it did 
 >> > not get 
 >> > revoked? And we do not have any policy delegation anymore, as none 
 >> > was listed? 
  
 >> > Or asked differently: How strict do we go with words in those 
 >> > entirely formal 
 >> > delegation mails? We all know what is meant, for sure, but does 
 >> > that count? 
 >> This is the third or fourth time this has happened with the Policy 
 >> delegation! 
 > I'm lost here since I have no context about this topic. 
  
 There is no context. 
  
 > It sounds like either the delegation announcement needs an errata, or 
 > there is 
 > some problem in the delegation execution in practice. None of them 
 > sounds minor. 
  
 It is "just" a copy paste editor. DPL wanted to withdraw the old 
 FTPMaster delegation. When we strictly follow the words he used he 
 withdraw the policy delegation instead, while leaving the old FTPMaster 
 one active. 
  
 -- 
 bye, Joerg 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)