
| Msg # 908 of 1179 on ZZLI4422, Thursday 8-13-25, 3:09 |
| From: ANDREY RAKHMATULLIN |
| To: THOMAS@GOIRAND.FR |
| Subj: Re: Request to reconsider i386 (x86) por |
From: wrar@debian.org On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 07:39:32PM +0200, thomas@goirand.fr wrote: >> But I gotta be honest, the news about scrapping i386 support in Trixie? Kinda hit like a brick. Yeah, I get it, there€€€s probably a mountain of technical headaches and, sure, 32-bit machines aren€€€t exactly the hot new thing. Still, there€€€s a bunch of us out here (and a lot of folks in schools, or just scraping by) who keep these old boxes alive. Sometimes that€€€s all you€€€ve got, you know? > > >Opposite view here ! > > >How about we completely get rid of 32 bits arch completely ? They are a loss of our valuable time... Agreed. Only one is left anyway (but I assume there is somewhat more opposition to getting rid of that one) if we don't count i386. -- WBR, wRAR -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJhBAABCgBLFiEEolIP6gqGcKZh3YxVM2L3AxpJkuEFAmicz40tFIAAAAAAFQAP cGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3Jnd3JhckBkZWJpYW4ub3JnAAoJEDNi9wMaSZLh CQUQAJwzffB+Rs6Petu/u21dVg3UM8jHUxDWaBt1W3e0mGuxuIS7+VTFPdPOPWl9 EzwEJLQv9Ru2Ii9Lndt5n5F9B0/Sn8knYR+itIHmg51sOOgcz49j87OiIjQP7EtU 2miI0gQ7XsMErZmJCud6Zgko26CAa9Dh2AtpCLqFMu4Hz309Cvl7csVXBFka3bB/ 3Ux0W/2Merb4Z8CKpJYaOCeRR679PlEOhJYtFKRwDigvODEeNzoONT1Chm6AmTA7 cT8PbdUb9vnfk6Z1tokm7Osam2c5Mj0RGZUkle4KBixmNeOEolIqFurvpkTqvscQ aF1mFgkzYtCC+ZnVTBrAr5rcO8srY5K/z6bKSmvAiiXn+oJ4wwGl4J04emNvAdhR 3ZTA+OgEk8ouREcrpRDY4KTYvdrk/PsRbA1JfHGqkaCBctl8dnNaf7SIqT0bVb/9 //E6buBqnt7okJjuokGyRbTtO4J9l3n+CKOnV+cu0Pdcg4zut99e9wXI3g8XcwwS rMhkjkHkFTEM5LXaNAF4hk1PN+s2bU2LWuqBBc6z0IcEgfma0exEQcXcNgKtP1I8 oFBOVW6d9FBlvYfDwYGGubRakNFVf088HBfdpWHvTmxkmN4L4nE+QELsXs/+R7dr kP2LXGK0s02oAN+hSHky1XAj//TWrOaZN+YkzX4ANiz5aO/G =zLen -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) |
328,097 visits
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca