home  bbs  files  messages ]

      ZZLI4422             linux.debian.devel             1194 messages      

[ previous | next | reply ]

[ list messages | list forums ]

  Msg # 878 of 1194 on ZZLI4422, Wednesday 10-14-25, 1:58  
  From: MARCO D'ITRI  
  To: MARC HABER  
  Subj: Re: Revisiting the hostname/FQDN issue,   
 From: md@Linux.IT 
  
 On Oct 13, Marc Haber  wrote: 
  
 >Other people solves this by putting the FQDN in /etc/hostname. I am 
 >not sure whether this is a viable solution. For me, it's enough proof 
 >Installer does it differently. 
 Why not? If your system has a real stable hostname then of course you 
 should put it there. Other people already told you that it will solve 
 your problem. 
  
 I think that this is one of those problems with multiple solutions none 
 of which is 100% perfect for all use cases. 
 d-i may be suboptimal or may already doing its best to have a default 
 which works for the most common case given the information it knows. 
  
 nss-myhostname solves a lot of real life problems, so it is a good idea 
 to install it by default. If you do not like how it works and have 
 other ways to manually make sure that your system has a "good" hostname 
 then good for you, nobody will get offended. 
  
 -- 
 ciao, 
 Marco 
  
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- 
  
 iHUEABYKAB0WIQQnKUXNg20437dCfobLPsM64d7XgQUCaO4MLwAKCRDLPsM64d7X 
 gbptAP4yIKPT6j/MU8jSX2fu7XJSbdeYTh6Xh2rHZvtZG/KZnAD/aSp8jW7vpb8D 
 rX5vrLiblb2suyggA8s5/FOdrVIfSgI= 
 =cgxE 
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) 

[ list messages | list forums | previous | next | reply ]

search for:

328,129 visits
(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca