
| Msg # 281 of 1194 on ZZLI4422, Friday 9-18-25, 1:17 |
| From: FLORIAN WEIMER |
| To: ALL |
| Subj: Re: Bug#1113864: Replace -fcf-protection |
From: fw@deneb.enyo.de * Emanuele Rocca: > Hi, > > On 2025-09-06 06:50, Guillem Jover wrote: >> Someone would need to check which shared objects are still not marked, >> in a similar way as what Emanuele Rocca has been doing for arm64 (with >> its PAC and BTI counterparts). > > On arm64, ELF files supporting what in Debian we call the "branch" > hardening features (PAC, BTI, GCS) are marked with a special ELF note. > > $ readelf -n a.out | grep Properties > Properties: AArch64 feature: BTI, PAC, GCS > > The checks mentioned by Guillem are based on that note. They are > performed daily on the whole archive, and the results are available > here: https://people.debian.org/~ema/pac-bti/ > > Is there a similar test that can be performed on x86 ELF files to find > out if fcf-protection is enabled properly? readelf -nw would print something like this: Displaying notes found in: .note.gnu.property Owner Data size Description GNU 0x00000040 NT_GNU_PROPERTY_TYPE_0 Properties: x86 feature: IBT, SHSTK x86 ISA needed: x86-64-baseline x86 feature used: x86, XMM x86 ISA used: x86-64-baseline With elfutils, it's: Note section [19] '.note.gnu.property' of 80 bytes at offset 0x5a48: Owner Data size Type GNU 64 GNU_PROPERTY_TYPE_0 X86 FEATURE_1_AND: 00000003 IBT SHSTK X86 0xc0008002 data: 01 00 00 00 X86 0xc0010001 data: 09 00 00 00 X86 0xc0010002 data: 01 00 00 00 The Intel CET features are IBT and SHSTK. The other subthread discusses enabling SHSTK only, in which case IBT would not show up. --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) |
328,129 visits
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca