
| Msg # 201 of 1179 on ZZLI4422, Monday 9-28-25, 1:12 |
| From: SAMUEL THIBAULT |
| To: ALL |
| Subj: Re: Lintian severity levels |
From: sthibault@debian.org Hello, Martin-€€ric Racine, le sam. 27 sept. 2025 09:41:58 +0300, a ecrit: > IMHO, in order for Lintian's severity levels to be meaningful in > determining a package's fitness for inclusion in the Debian > repository, an Error ought to refer to a MUST[NOT] Policy item, I don't think lintian errors are supposed to match policy items. While lintian fatal errors (used by ftpmaster to reject package) can, indeed. I mean, I don't think we'll try to encode in the policy all pieces that we know are errors that will hit us somehow and we want to highlight to maintainers. Just taking the first tag I see coming: Just taking the first example I can find in the tags: Tag: apache2-configuration-files-need-conf-suffix Severity: error Check: apache2 Explanation: The package is installing an Apache2 configuration but that file does not end with a ' |
328,104 visits
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca