From: joerg@debian.org 
  
 On 17691 March 1977, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: 
  
 > Maybe, instead than retrofitting a policy on the debian salsa group, a 
 > good way to both clarify the situation and allow an opt-in mechanism 
 > would be to create another group on salsa, with rules clearly defined 
 > from the start, and let maintainers decide of the maintenance model 
 > they 
 > want for the package they currently maintain. After all it's very 
 > simple 
 > to move projects between groups in salsa, and just requires an upload 
 > to 
 > update the VCS fields. 
  
 Other way round makes more sense IMO. Instead of yet another huge group 
 that needs to be maintained in some way, keep the existing one the only 
 such large monster. And anyone who put things there and now has a 
 different opinion can move their package out of that into a different 
 small group just for that package (or a set of packages). That will be a 
 way smaller overhead. 
  
 -- 
 bye, Joerg 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)