home  bbs  files  messages ]

      ZZLI4422             linux.debian.devel             1179 messages      

[ previous | next | reply ]

[ list messages | list forums ]

  Msg # 128 of 1179 on ZZLI4422, Tuesday 9-22-25, 1:05  
  From: REINHARD TARTLER  
  To: ALL  
  Subj: Re: Bug#1115714: impossible to install c  
 From: siretart@gmail.com 
  
 On Sun, Sep 21, 2025 at 6:23€€€AM Alexander Kj€€ll  
 wrote: 
  
 > > 
 > > And to spell it out explicitly we would prefer if you changed from 
 > > A) 
 > >         Upload $package + its missing dependencies to unstable 
 > > 
 > > (Causing unstable containing broken packages for $random, posibly very 
 > > very long time)) 
 > > 
 > > to 
 > > 
 > > B) 
 > >         * Upload $package + its missing dependencies to experimental 
 > >         * Wait for all parts to pass through NEW 
 > >         * Re-upload everything to unstable 
 > > 
 > > cu Andreas 
 > 
 > Sure. 
 > 
 > This sounds to me like it should be a Debian wide policy. If this is a 
 > problem, why are uploads to unstable that need to go through NEW even 
 > allowed in the first place? 
 > 
  
 Because most uploads to unstable that require NEW processing don't depend 
 on packages that aren't in the archive yet. 
  
 Let's please not ask ftp-master to implement a policy to reject or delay 
 packages that have such missing dependencies. I'm concerned that would 
 delay NEW processing even more. 
  
 -- 
 regards, 
     Reinhard 
  
 


On   Sun, Sep 21, 2025 at 6:23€€€AM   Alexander Kj€€ll <   lexander.kjall@gmail.com> wrote:
>
   > And to spell it out explicitly we would prefer if you changed from
   > A)
   >€€ €€ €€ €€ €€Upload $package + its missing dependencies to unstable
   >
   > (Causing unstable containing broken packages for $random, posibly   very
   > very long time))
   >
   > to
   >
   > B)
   >€€ €€ €€ €€ €€* Upload $package + its missing dependencies to   experimental
   >€€ €€ €€ €€ €€* Wait for all parts to pass through NEW
   >€€ €€ €€ €€ €€* Re-upload everything to unstable
   >
   > cu Andreas
   
   Sure.
   
   This sounds to me like it should be a Debian wide policy. If this is a
   problem, why are uploads to unstable that need to go through NEW even
   allowed in the first place?

Because most uploads to unstable that   require NEW processing don't depend on packages that aren't in the   archive yet.

Let's please not ask ftp-master to implement a   policy   to reject or delay packages that have such missing dependencies. I'm   concerned€€that would delay   NEW processing even more.

--
regards,
€€ €€ Reinhard
      --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) 

[ list messages | list forums | previous | next | reply ]

search for:

328,106 visits
(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca