
| Msg # 1153 of 1179 on ZZLI4422, Thursday 11-05-25, 11:10 |
| From: ADRIAN BUNK |
| To: JOHN GOERZEN |
| Subj: Re: Binary-only rebuild of a package in |
10:03:35 0.1, USER_IN_ h/aQsc8YqeoNbaaKdA@localhost From: bunk@debian.org On Tue, Nov 04, 2025 at 10:43:42PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > Hello, > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1118629 pertains to a > bug that can be resolved in trixie by simply rebuilding ckermit from > source. A rebuild is not really a solution for the root cause. The root cause of the problem is that OpenSSL changed it's version rules for ABI compatibility (1.0 and 1.1 were not ABI-compatible, but ABI is compatible among 3.x version), and C-Kermit still assumes the old one. The proper solution in this case is to patch out the OpenSSL check from C-Kermit and then backport that change in a pu request[1] for trixie. The actual requirement is already handled by the soname and the automatically generated dependency on libssl3t64. In the extremely rare case that a package actually has a stricter requirement than the soversion of the library, it would have to create a matching dependency like "libssl3t64 (>= 3.5), libssl3t64 (<< 3.6)" during the build. > I'd like to know how to accomplish this. Is there someone that I could > contact to do that? Or does it require a new changelog entry, and > source upload, to trixie-proposed-updates or some such? For a binNMU request (which might get rejected due to the above issue) do: reportbug release.debian.org 1 binnmu binNMU requests > Thanks, > > John cu Adrian [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs. html#special-case-uploads-to-the-stable-and-oldstable-distributions --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) |
328,082 visits
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca