From: ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk 
  
 Russ Allbery writes ("Gerrit and different merge UIs (was: debian/watch 
 version 5)"): 
 > One feature I do still miss from Gerrit that I don't think GitHub has is 
 > the ability to merge a single commit from a merge request composed of 
 > multiple commits. With GitHub, so far as I know, I have to manually add 
 > the remote locally 
  
 gitlab does offer one feature that makes this slightly less annoying: 
 the MR branch is available at a fixed location, which you can fetch 
 from directly via the target branch's remote, without adding a new 
 remote for the fork. 
  
 Soemthing like this: 
    git fetch origin +merge-requests/299/head:m 
 which leaves you with a local branch `m` which is the same as the MR. 
  
 The you can use your favourite tool to make a prefix branch out of it, 
 or cherry pick, or whatever.  If that merges into main, the gitlab 
 view of the MR is adjusted accordingly. 
  
 HTH. 
  
 Ian. 
  
 PS: I agree (obviously) with everything you're saying in this thread. 
  
 -- 
 Ian Jackson    These opinions are my own. 
  
 Pronouns: they/he.  If I emailed you from @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, 
 that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter. 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)