From: yadd@debian.org 
  
 On 8/16/25 06:41, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: 
 > On 15/08/25 at 23:53 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: 
 >> On Thu, 14 Aug 2025 10:25:32 +0200, Xavier wrote: 
 >> 
 >>> I propose to release it to unstable, then backports. And then we 
 >>> will be able to push it into debci machines (else tracker will 
 >>> report errors for all version-5 files). 
 >>> What do you think ? 
 >> 
 >> I think this is great! 
 >> Please go ahead and thanks for your great work. 
 > 
 > Hi, 
 > 
 > I'm not sure why debci is mentionned here (how is ci.debian.net related 
 > to uscan?). I think that tracker.d.o gets it upstream version data 
 > from UDD, which uses a vendorized uscan version to get uscan. See 
 > https://salsa.debian.org/qa/udd/-/blob/master/rimporters/upstr 
 am.rb?ref_type=heads 
 > 
 > Is there a package already in the archive that uses version 5, so I can 
 > test that updating devcripts in UDD works? 
 > 
 > Lucas 
  
 Hi, 
  
 yes, udd's uscan reports this (node-redis): 
  
    uscan had problems while searching for a new upstream version: 
    debian/watch is an obsolete version 1 watch file; 
     please upgrade to a higher version 
     (see uscan(1) for details). 
  
 So it will be needed to update uscan to manage version-5 packages. 
  
 Best regards, 
 Xavier 
  
 NB: old uscan wants "version=4" while now it's "Version: 5", so 
 considered as file-without-version, => version 1 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)