riscv64)
13:01:
paris-
From: owner@bugs.debian.org
This is a multi-part message in MIME format...
Your message dated Tue, 4 Nov 2025 13:57:58 +0100
with message-id <20251104135758.1a6c4ae5@roma.ideev.universite-paris-saclay.
fr>
and subject line Re: isospec: FTBFS on ppc64el and riscv64
has caused the Debian Bug report #1118661,
regarding isospec: FTBFS on ppc64el and riscv64
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1118661: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1118661
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2025 16:18:02 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(2024-03-25) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-121.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,
BODY_INCLUDES_PACKAGE,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FROMDEVELOPER,HAS_PACKAGE,PGPSIGNATURE,
SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
version=4.0.1-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 32; hammy, 150; neutral, 27; spammy,
0. spammytokens:
hammytokens:0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:stravin,
0.000-+--H*RT:sk:stravin, 0.000-+--Hx-spam-relays-external:311,
0.000-+--H*RT:311, 0.000-+--H*RT:108
Return-path:
Received: from stravinsky.debian.org ([2001:41b8:202:deb::311:108]:54916)
by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_
SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
(Exim 4.96)
(envelope-from )
id 1vBy0n-003PQq-39
for submit@bugs.debian.org;
Thu, 23 Oct 2025 16:18:02 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.
org;
s=smtpauto.stravinsky; h=X-Debian-User:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-
ID:
Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References;
bh=B0lumONGQ6RPp82AQ3WGu3aVd2dCo5QpBlFTTANtddQ=; b
=Hf+cqsRx/ZiemcVL/3ti/iCcyk
2fxNmCKjJajDnzQTVq61vUo8KDBuJQ8/iUiIxu3pEDzBHDHJNk
9qNYoVygf7VkEzBrxs0MQmKlbxk
vHuH7HDU0G/rK0cW9MgUDjjzJQ9irEXV/fyFfPaLzx3CzwLGv3
2fGvQvb/xHBqHIllbAgaPOglCLT
6+j7UqA/y5311aiGEwVIbtTzHJw3ats9Vr1DpgM+gaSP3x0QcP
KkBM/x8skgq9Ju/axAmYayScGBl
bRsmMUlXLX/YaCOg9lrOplJted+oLe0LQbxw059+nVkwL6BaAf
JR7rWLeClli6yozrDwTmhNfuJFu
bzc44HQg==;
Received: from authenticated user
by stravinsky.debian.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDH
E_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256)
(Exim 4.94.2)
(envelope-from )
id 1vBy0l-008KNq-C4; Thu, 23 Oct 2025 16:18:00 +0000
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 00:17:55 +0800
From: Bo YU
To: Debian Bug Tracking System
Subject: isospec: FTBFS on ppc64el and riscv64
Message-ID: <20251023161755.cve5dapajhpupc3q@debian>
X-Reportbug-Version: 12.0.0
X-PGP-Key: https://github.com/yuzibo/yuzibo.github.
io/blob/master/_includes/subkey-signing-06-18-143E4BAF-pub.asc
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jduehymhwyp4g6ll"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Debian-User: vimer
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
--jduehymhwyp4g6ll
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: isospec
Version: 2.2.3+cleaned1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs patch
User: debian-riscv@lists.debian.org
Usertags: riscv64
User: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64el
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-riscv@lists.debian.org, debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
isospec failed to build ppc64el and riscv64 due to -march=native:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=isospec&arch=ppc64el&ver=2.2.
3%2Bcleaned1-1&stamp=1761070922&raw=0
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=isospec&arch=riscv64&ver=2.2.
3%2Bcleaned1-1&stamp=1761101061&raw=0
I proposal one patch below and test it on riscv64:
--- a/setup.py
+++ b/setup.py
@@ -36,10 +36,7 @@
return ["/O2", "/std:c++17"]
if use_asan:
return '-O0 -g -DISOSPEC_DEBUG -std=c++17 -fsanitize=address'.
split()
- ret = ['-O3', '-std=c++17']
- if native_ok:
- ret.extend(['-mtune=native', '-march=native'])
- return ret
+ return ['-O3', '-std=c++17']
cmodule = Extension('IsoSpecCppPy',
sources = ['IsoSpec++/python-build.cpp'],
--
Regards,
--
Bo YU
--jduehymhwyp4g6ll
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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Jt/0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--jduehymhwyp4g6ll--
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|