
| Msg # 94 of 15094 on ZZLI4416, Monday 10-12-25, 1:12 |
| From: NICHOLAS D STEEVES |
| To: 21NAOWN@GMAIL.COM |
| Subj: Bug#921038: "btrfs filesystem resize", a |
From: sten@debian.org Hi, Sorry no one replied to your bug sooner. I became the maintainer of btrfs-progs for Debian at 6.12-1. 21naown@gmail.com writes: > Package: btrfs-progs > Version: 4.7.3-1 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: upstream > > > "min" could be used to minimize a Btrfs filesystem as "max" is used to > maximize a Btrfs filesystem, which would avoid to use "btrfs > inspect-internal min-dev-size" and at least one other software to > extract the number (for example "cut"). > Can't [g]parted already do this in an easy and safe way? What is the use case for what you're proposing and why would it be preferable to [g]parted? Regards, Nicholas --=-=-Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJEBAEBCgAuFiEE4qYmHjkArtfNxmcIWogwR199EGEFAmjq1Z0QHHN0ZW5AZGVi aWFuLm9yZwAKCRBaiDBHX30QYWaQEAC3dMXa4v3YNgAkCSV+D93vreplWWjOGBpu J1pGRLbuAT21G3l/tdIiIWsDf5zGFbL8MlUKYg4LZsrQ6rcWheE957U7nVHJtX45 zy8DpkQHfvSgmfZKk7Y8vBUbHnjBCCmTPdvKcHffc/0XlfU96rl2HH1/XTWVSyNe hFUnEic7pkExieLkxm3vppVUTaxz3s6eYoqBF7Oyw4lREU7gBEYNGbqtg8l01enM wYmoFb1q3dXLmBerzqEwxIRomMEGx5GuiC0UJukq7uCfHb7/px4+EN7AjrpNEgiM F6cwPX16dgtLBoqdHWAXi68gMcbnh2j/23rHGjiPalVMokyPGWcmRQYNe4fl3T+w NDCX9iAFDTt/ggi/ovaGIy4L3L8ZbafuJ3fq6+PVFzpe2iZ0XLkXcTuzqoYfIOw9 HjWeRbqTpqesZiyTjuoole1N5z6+ZbXRfUhZ94j0pG7q42Z6HdX+v0z+0tO25bhZ V9/NymjOWypDvP8H1vs3NYePOdY6sh0kUgMW3vAr3CKV+Uwi+7Fgv0A4l7n3BfA9 53yemk9fhtPW35w2mLDlMyzjQFjvOxPyqi61kZ9t8rJYZHCYK9aHx3DXgnJRfmZu X47Ywdg3WEUEl74eILLqPamB1NgpvMDYVpGTWzNj2XhpBnDfRk8XWUNKl4URajlv jsvJqPj/TA==yrEg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) |
328,100 visits
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca