From: apandada1@gmail.com 
  
 > It cannot be an ITA because the package is not up for adoption. 
 > You are hijacking the package, unless you have a prior agreement with the 
 > current maintainer, which you need to provide. 
  
 I'm sorry, all I really want is to get the updated package to Debian. I 
 have no intention to take over the current maintainers position (I emailed 
 the maintainer on September 21 but did not receive any reply). 
  
 I am not very familiar with all the rules of how Debian packages are 
 managed. Could you please explain what I should do in this case if I just 
 want to get the package updated? 
 If not ITA, can it be an NMU? Should I create a different bug report 
 against `sponsorship-requests` for that? 
  
 Best, 
 Archisman 
  
  
 On Thu, Oct 2, 2025 at 3:51€€€AM Andrey Rakhmatullin  
 wrote: 
  
 > Control: -1 + moreinfo 
 > 
 > It cannot be an ITA because the package is not up for adoption. 
 > You are hijacking the package, unless you have a prior agreement with the 
 > current maintainer, which you need to provide. 
 > 
 > On Thu, Oct 02, 2025 at 02:47:21AM -0400, Archisman Panigrahi wrote: 
 > > safeeyes (3.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium 
 > > . 
 > >   * New upstream release 
 > >   * Edited dependencies as recommended by upstream 
 > 
 > And the maintainer change isn't even mentioned in the changelog. 
 > 
 > -- 
 > WBR, wRAR 
 > 
  
 
> It cannot be an ITA because the package is not up for 
 adoption.
> You are hijacking the package, unless you have a prior 
 agreement with the 
> current 
 maintainer, which you need to provide.

I'm sorry, 
 all 
 I really want is to get the updated package to Debian. I have no intention 
 to 
 take over the current 
 maintainers position (I emailed the maintainer on September 21 but did not 
 receive any reply).

I am not very 
 familiar with all the rules of how Debian packages are managed. Could you 
 please explain what I should do in this case if€€I just want to get the 
 package updated?€€
If not ITA, can it 
 be an NMU? Should I create a different bug report against `spons 
 rship-requests` for that?

Best,
Archisman

On 
 Thu, Oct 2, 2025 at 3:51€€€AM Andrey 
 Rakhmatullin <Control: -1 + moreinfo
 
 
 
 It cannot be an ITA because the package is not up for adoption.
 
 You are hijacking the package, unless you have a prior agreement with the 
 
 
 current maintainer, which you need to provide.
 
 
 
 On Thu, Oct 02, 2025 at 02:47:21AM -0400, Archisman Panigrahi wrote:
 
 > safeeyes (3.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
 > .
 
 >€€ €€* New upstream release
 
 >€€ €€* Edited dependencies as recommended by upstream
 
 
 
 And the maintainer change isn't even mentioned in the changelog.
 
 
 
 -- 
 
 WBR, wRAR
 
 
 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)