18: 
 org 
 release@lists. 
 XPost: linux.debian.devel.release 
 From: jlblanco@ual.es 
  
 Package: release.debian.org 
 Severity: normal 
 X-Debbugs-Cc: octomap@packages.debian.org, jlblanco@ual.es 
 Control: affects -1 + src:octomap 
 User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org 
 Usertags: transition 
  
 I want to transition octomap from 1.9.7 to 1.10.0. 
 The new version has new ABI with new SONAME (liboctomap.so.1.10, 
 liboctomath.so.1.10, liboctovis.so.1.10). 
  
 Builds for the new version in experimental is green for all architectures. 
  
 There are only 3 other packages depending on octomap: 
 Level 2: 
 - fcl 
 - mrpt 
 Level 3: 
 - dart 
  
 I chroot built them against the new octomap version with these results: 
 - fcl: builds OK. 
 - mrpt: builds OK. 
 - dart: 17 / 71 unit tests failed, but I'm almost totally sure that's not 
 because of octomap... 
  
 Ben file: 
  
 title = "octomap"; 
 is_affected = .depends ~ "liboctomap1" | .depends ~ "liboctomath1" | . 
 depends ~ "liboctovis1"; 
 is_good = .depends ~ "liboctomap1.10" | .depends ~ "liboctomath1.10" | . 
 depends ~ "liboctovis1.10"; 
 is_bad = .depends ~ "liboctomap1" | .depends ~ "liboctomath1" | .depends ~ 
 "liboctovis1"; 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)