
| Msg # 15041 of 15094 on ZZLI4416, Wednesday 11-04-25, 5:10 |
| From: ANDREAS TILLE |
| To: ALL |
| Subj: Bug#1080956: SaunaFS |
16: 1IIP4REXHN4PA@ 5ff04e9340ad@ < From: tille@debian.org Hi, Am Tue, Nov 04, 2025 at 03:33:07PM +0200 schrieb Urmas Rist: > > I think MR's (I assume they are the equivalent to Github's PR's?) are the > best right now, so I can also have a look at them. Yes, MRs on Gitlab (Salsa) are the equivalent to Github's PR's. > My main worry is that the Debian 12 changes might conflict or introduce > unnecesary changes with the current package on sid (e.g, I/Tony had to > disable a -Werror on Debian 12, which is not needed for newer sid and > Debian 13). This should be made conditional. "Closing our eyes" just for the sake of backports > I know there are backports, but I'm not sure how they should be handled. > Is it better to have another branch for this? Yes, having a separate branch makes perfectly sense. We also can't currently create some official backport. If you want to upload to backports.debian.org the package needs to be in testing first (and its not even in unstable :-( ) > I don't mind helping to maintain one for Debian 12 until it's EOL, > though it might become harder for later SaunaFS versions (if more > dependencies are added). I personally would really target to Debian 13. This is where backports.debian.org is helpful. > More importantly, Tony discovered a bug with the pam limits on open > files. There's still the old Lizardfs limits file (actually I checked, > there's also another lizardfs file). I think it's a big bug, so I'm > wondering if one could resubmit the package to FTP again with a fix? Congratulations to Tony! ;-) I would *not* do any action right now. Just lets wait until the package hits unstable. We need to do some Source only upload than anyway and this could contain the fix. Kind regards Andreas. -- https://fam-tille.de --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) |
328,100 visits
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca