home  bbs  files  messages ]

      ZZLI4416             linux.debian.bugs.dist             15094 messages      

[ previous | next | reply ]

[ list messages | list forums ]

  Msg # 14948 of 15094 on ZZLI4416, Saturday 8-15-25, 8:36  
  From: IAN JACKSON  
  To: SEAN WHITTON  
  Subj: Bug#1111233: git-debpush: inconvenient t  
 From: ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk 
  
 Sean Whitton writes ("Bug#1111233: git-debpush: inconvenient to debrebase 
 right before uploading"): 
 > For git-debrebase packages this is how I upload: 
 > 
 >     git debrebase 
 >     dgit push-source 
 >     git push --follow-tags --no-verify 
 > 
 > I do a debrebase here specifically to ensure that the commit finalising 
 > the changelog appears behind the patch queue.  This relies on how 'dgit 
 > push-source' knows about git-debrebase, and so knows to restitch. 
  
 Maybe you want   git-debrebase quick 
  
 > Therefore, I can't easily replace doing a dgit push with 'git debpush'. 
 > It would immediately fail on the unstitched branch. 
 > 
 > I wonder if git-debpush could learn how to restitch. 
  
 Currently git-debpush never makes any commits.  This is probably a 
 good property for it to continue to have. 
  
 If it did start to make commits there would be Consequences.  For 
 example, what would "dry run" mean?  How would you debug/test it as a 
 cautious user?  What about if there's nowhere for those commits to go 
 because you're not on a branch?  I bet it would turn out that the 
 commits would be wrong somehow.  etc. etc. 
  
 Ian. 
  
 -- 
 Ian Jackson    These opinions are my own. 
  
 Pronouns: they/he.  If I emailed you from @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, 
 that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter. 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) 

[ list messages | list forums | previous | next | reply ]

search for:

328,116 visits
(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca