home  bbs  files  messages ]

      ZZLI4416             linux.debian.bugs.dist             15094 messages      

[ next | reply ]

[ list messages | list forums ]

  Msg # 1 of 15094 on ZZLI4416, Wednesday 11-04-25, 4:20  
  From: AARON RAINBOLT  
  To: MARC HABER  
  Subj: Bug#1119964: Add a drop directory fallba  
 03: 
 q0yvJAy5GcV+0TZFZHrmxwohvw 
 OizTdqO6HwFGF8eanMqcthw2a2 
 Pge9Ffj/CzqqJD3hDMXgOf/sdRH 
 e6CPc/jEsBOiTNqX8DifEET3QP5 
 0lQ+Tbr8b+qPbZCUoJUj/ih3PRm 
 AdNCQm9w4r0l94hZSe3P0bUStWF 
 t8KrZja2xxQwB4QdWY0IizwgzmX 
 e9e14a558f8ab- 
 ( 
 From: arraybolt3@gmail.com 
  
 On Mon, 3 Nov 2025 10:07:52 +0100 
 Marc Haber  wrote: 
  
 > Hi, 
 > 
 > On Sun, Nov 02, 2025 at 09:34:12PM -0600, Aaron Rainbolt wrote: 
 > >zg-policy-rc.d currently has a fallback mechanism for finding the 
 > >proper policy-rc.d file: 
 > > 
 > >* If `POLICYRCD` is already set, use the script the variable points 
 > >to. 
 > >* Otherwise, source `/etc/zg-policy-rc.d.conf`, and if `POLICYRCD` is 
 > >  now set, use the script the variable points to. 
 > >* If `POLICYRCD` still isn't set, try to use 
 > >  `/usr/local/sbin/policy-rc.d`. 
 > >* And if that fails, then try to use `/etc/policy-rc.d`. 
 > 
 > This looks like this needs a major internal rework. I had to read my 
 > own code to understand its shortcomings as I assumed it was way more 
 > sophisticated. Alas, it isn't. 
 > 
 > >This is good, but it means for an application or package that needs 
 > >to introduce controls for service restarts for whatever reason, 
 > >there's no way for it to insert it's own `policy-rc.d` 
 > >implementation that `zg-policy-rc.d` will pick up, without having to 
 > >override either `/usr/local/sbin/policy-rc.d` or 
 > >`/etc/zg-policy-rc.d.conf`, both of which are non-ideal. 
 > 
 > I am not sure whether I intended this package to be used by another 
 > package. And I am not sure whether policy-rc.d will work reliably on 
 > a systemd system. I wrote that one 20 years ago and the code hasn't 
 > been touched ever since. 
  
 My use case for it is just controlling what services do and don't 
 restart during apt upgrades, which does still work with systemd. 
  
 > >Would this be a feature that an interested user could contribute? 
 > >A Debian derivative I work with (Kicksecure) has a use case that 
 > >would benefit from this, and I can probably send a patch to 
 > >implement it. 
 > 
 > Would you want to take over or co-maintain the package? I can put the 
 > package on salsa and you can file a merge request. I just can't 
 > guarantee that the code will work under all circumstances. 
  
 Sure, that would be great. Thanks for the offer! 
  
 -- 
 Aaron 
  
 > Greetings 
 > Marc 
 > 
  
  
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- 
  
 iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEudh48PFXwyPDa0wGpwkWDXPHkQkFAmkJblkACgkQpwkWDXPH 
 kQl/LA//eHMJuATYhg1sKA8um4IvhjkoRT/PcHnOFegZhhPeOmanrP5RHylgkkpF 
 Nyrx/AupWe5czW7kLj4OUTYbWw0eVFE9QF/BQ3QiLt4Ac62S06IalKvHTwyjQFzy 
 hSXVIECnlYsBNNFw95m/vE1/FZRJWivnv1A0pb7j6jK2cfEPFtRhKkk4snucyJJi 
 UxoCtfbObVLE1A/MW/wrP1X7jxc9lNDFqOIJjVzk3IC+oCvudCvmRwUZfrb7mVL5 
 /FOu55O5vwAQ77+U8FUF2dw3smihgyrpz0Wbu2YRR0DhavcI43/XSjtYgVJIvM5/ 
 dep2fN4kpsrxvF5My7F97QxgkuHH2MrRjoCSkc5HknMlO9mydPeuZ128tYfcIoqO 
 kSvmXONWpEzt7g9lhCZfPKWqsJsX3vlR+eiLa/5YimPYPCClC5snYu0Pa7gI0uev 
 phhDSnnAGGxnCZfW3l4Q5tBUXI5oR36Nsvyo9SDscKX9nku8laka7kLSbNPiLOKh 
 ad1fu0FG0o1tqejRvos/RjGvKH7Q55Cok/GBOdBgntiMEkKRwJovOIUB1LeVkRLs 
 M6izKAZZ8s3sBFZkhYfFCmRM3LAx2yVn2+H12zjp0HVwTkPpy8tYr/gjayf+dotO 
 kwy2JrTLvDVxBYakH5t1M2ODMhF5SfJqSgZlTeNO3AobR/FvLCY= 
 =WTdM 
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) 
    

[ list messages | list forums | next | reply ]

search for:

328,104 visits
(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca