XPost: ott.general
From: lynnharrison@sympatico.ca
I don't know what the use is in having a container of yogurt unless it is at
least 125 grams for a single serving. When you start cutting the size down
to 100 grams or less...who will want to buy it?
For your information, all yogurt single serving containers were 125 grams at
one point. I remember they used to go on sale for $3.99 for a case of 12.
Then I started noticing some companies reducing the size to 100 grams, yet
the price stayed the same.
If it bothers you, e-mail the company and tell them you're not happy.
"Patrick Coghlan" wrote in message
news:43fa7dc2$0$1595$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
> Lynn wrote:
>
>>The same thing happened with ground coffee at the beginning of the 1990s.
>>The vacuum-packed coffee was 369 grans at that point, then they made the
>>package to a 300 gram standard package size yet the price stayed the same
>>or increased.
>>
> Yeah, that's what I'm wondering with the single-serving yogurt.
>
> I'd really like to find out if they were larger than 100g before the new
> labeling.
>
>>Who did the coffee companies think they were fooling anyhow? When
>>customer refuse to buy their product, they'll have to rethink their greedy
>>strategies. I hate it when companies do that because it insults my
>>intelligence. Why not just keep the price the same but raise the price
>>because at least it's more honest that way.
>>
>
> Want another example of price-creep? Check out those Glad large kitchen
> bags. I'm pretty sure they were about $4 last time I bought some, but the
> other day I saw them at Loblaws for over $6!
>
>>
>>"Patrick Coghlan" wrote in message
>>news:43fa1bfc$0$1847$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...
>>
>>>Is it just my perception, or did Danone pull a fast one and shrink the
>>>size of the containers when they came out with the new packaging?
>>>
>>>They say 100g on the package. Anyone have an old container kicking
>>>around?
>>
>>
>>
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|