XPost: nf.general
From: bo0tiez@hotmail.com
for me i'm not calling anyone a crook but i do think that it isn't being
very fair when you are the only two stores in a very small community at
least 45 minutes away from any other options to charge people a dollar per
purchase no matter the amount..(but since they know you have no choice i
guess they think its fair)...there are more than me in this community that
do not have the luxury of a vehicle to go elsewhere so we are left with no
choice...and yes i would use cash except for that fact my choice for pay is
either cheque or direct deposit...if i take cheque then i cannot get to a
bank to cash it (it is also 45 mins away)..if i take out any amount from $1
and up using my debit card at the store i am charged $2...i suppose an
option could be to write cheques LOL or best yet....move :)
"Terry" wrote in message
news:81Wue.79152$Kk4.1152113@news20.bellglobal.com...
>
> "JustBrowsing" wrote in message
> news:1119575950.413348.40960@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> > Crooks??? You have no idea...they could just up the price on everything
> > and you wouldn't know the difference. At least you have a choice to use
> > cash or debit. It's your call...nobody says you "have" to use debit.
> >
> As just browsing has said and I agree;
>
> It is not 'crooked' i.e. dishonest to make such charges and/or include
such
> costs in pricing.
>
> Surcharges may irritate a customer, such as myself, but as long as one is
> advised.
> In this, my first instance, which started this whole thread/question, the
> cashier took care to tell me.
>
> She was doing her job well from both the viewpoint of her employer and
mine
> as a customer.
> Nothing crooked/dishonest about that.
>
> Having received that information I had a decision to make.
>
> 1) Not buy that item, for less than $5.
> 2) Buy something else to raise the purchase above $5, and avoid the 25
cent
> surcharge.
> 3) Not buy at all.
> 4) Use cash.
>
> Also as a customer it is rare that I HAVE to buy a particular item, HAVE
to
> buy it at a particular store and/or HAVE to use a debit card.
> Any retailer is entitled to structure their pricing etc. so as to, stay in
> business, be competitive, make a reasonable profit, attract customers etc.
> The concept that all business is dishonest is wrong. Also a retailer may
> under-price, say, milk (as a loss leader) knowing that most of the time I
> will often buy other items on which they will make a profit.
>
> Unintelligent comments about crooks etc. make no sense. What would be
best?
> Charge nothing at all, therefore pay very low wages to the people growing
or
> making the products, have the government regulate who, what and where
> anything can be manufactured and sold ..... etc.
> It's called Communism and it hasn't worked, yet, in parts of the world as
> varying as the Iron Curtain countries to Cuba!
>
> Just to repeat; the basic premise here is that we, as consumers/customers
> should be aware of any/all of these extra charges that have crept into our
> financial dealings; these 'extras' range from paying a fee to use a bank
> machine (ABM) not of the same brand as our bank, surcharges as discussed
> here for certain (generally 'small') transactions, cheque return charges,
> transfer funds fees and many others. And don't even mention not paying off
> the monthly balance on your credit card! Most expensive and can affect
your
> credit rating, possibly also leading to an even higher rate of interest!
>
> To paraphrase "Be careful out there. It's expensive to earn or spend
money."
>
>
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|