XPost: calgary.general, can.general, can.politics
XPost: edm.general
From: donw102@shaw.ca
"Jon Flamming" wrote in message
news:20050118090757511-0700@news.telusplanet.net...
> In Don Wagner wrote:
>>
>> "Jon Flamming" wrote in message
>> news:20050116231726483-0700@news.telusplanet.net...
>>> In Don Wagner wrote:
>>>>
>>>> wrote in message
>>>> news:1105911628.864007.140910@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>>>>> "Press your nose and make a buzzer sound" Glen
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The question was: "How many Presidents have fought in combat in
>>>>> the
>>>>> last 200 years?"
>>>>> .
>>>>> The answer is still "zero". No Presidents have *ever* been in
>>>>> combat.
>>>>
>>>> In no particular order
>>>>
>>>> Garfeild -- Colonel in the Civil War. May have been at the
>>>> battle,
>> Brigadeer, later Major General. Led a brigade at Middle Creek,
>> Kentuckey
>
> Ooooo...Battle of Middle Creek. Lucky for him he managed to avoid
> Gettysburg.
I see. So Gettysburg was the only battle of the Civil war?
>
>
>>>> but may not have seen action. Wealthy family, you see.
>>
>> Right. Fatherless at 2. Canal boat horse driver. Wealthy my ass.
>
> He did get into politics, right? Made it to a brigader, right?
> Sounds
> like there was monied influence at work.
So please point out where it came from.
>
>>
>>>> George Bush -- The elder? Flew torpedo bombers in the Pacfic. Was
>>>> shot
>>>> down and recovered.
>>
>> The Elder
>>
>>>> Gerald Ford -- Who cares?
>>
>>>> U.S. Grant -- About the only real fighting he did was in the
>>>> Mexican
>>>> War. Commanded during the Civil War as a general, but generals
>>>> never
>>>> see action anyway.
>>>
>>>> Benjamin Harrison -- Another higher-ranking officer. Never really
>>>> saw
>>>> combat. Wealthy family.
>>
>> Born on a farm. Not wealthy. What does wealth have to do with it
>> anyway?
>
> Family owned land, therefore, wealthy. As for the wealth aspect of
> it,
> it was well-known that wealthy families could assure that their sons
> could serve in the Civil War, but never see combat, unless there was
> some unforeseen circumstance. Hell, even during conscription, anyone
> could get out of service if they paid $300. That where they got the
> term,
> "Rich man's war, poor man's fight."
So are you saying he never saw combat? Please provide a cite.
>
>> As far as combat, he was a Colonel. Not unheard of for them to see
>> combat
>> in that era
>>
>>>> William Henry Harrison -- Ditto
>>
>> Say lots of combat against the indians.
>
> Were you there?
No but apparantly you were. Please enlighten us.
>
>>
>>>> Rutherford Hayes -- Same
>>
>> Strange how he got wounded if, as you say, he never saw combat.
>
> It amazing how getting any kind of injury means you're wounded in
> combat.
> He likely fell out of bed and hit his head on the floor.
And you know this how?
>
>>
>>>> Andrew Jackson -- Actually did fight and really did kill. One of
>>>> a
>>>> very few number.
>>>> John F. Kennedy -- Some question as to his combat record. Likely
>>>> commanded a PT boat because they were unlikely to see action.
>>>> Just
>>>> J.F.
>>>> K's luck it didn't turn out that way.
>>>
>>>> A. Lincoln -- Really did fight.
>>>
>>>> William Mckinley -- Actually was an member of command staff.
>>>> Secretary
>>>> will a rank.
>>
>> A Private as a member of Command staff? He ended the war as a
>> brevet
>> Major
>>>
>>>> James Monroe -- he fought.
>>>
>>>> Theodore Roosevelt -- He said he did.
>>
>> So did the men he commanded
>
> Paid to say that. Wouldn't you?
Says who?
>
>
>>
>>>
>>>> Zachery Taylor -- Fought, but who cares? It's Zachary Taylor.
>>>>
>>>> Nixon, Ford and Johnson were all in WWII and may or
>>>> may not have seen combat
>>>
>>> Are you kidding? Only the media or the motor pool was shot at.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jimmy Carter was in the Navy and may have seen service
>>>> in Korea
>>>
>>> Was in the US Navy so little got so match as a scratch in Korea.
>>
>> Not sure what you mean here. He was in the Navy for 7 years.
>
> And never got so much as a scratch - pretty obvious.
Not getting a scratch and not being in Korea are 2 different things.
It seems he wasn't but not being sure, I said "May have"
>
> The one thing I've noticed in politics is that one's record on
> anything
> is embellished. If someone fell out of bed, they were wounded in
> action.
> If they wrote the orders, they lead the men in combat. Politicians
> cannot be trusted under any circumstance.
Why not? Or didn't Dwight Eisehower actually have something to do
with winning WWII?
Don Wagner
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|