XPost: calgary.general, can.general, can.politics
XPost: edm.general
From: Peter@White.net
CalgaryBill wrote:
> "Peter White" wrote in message
> news:ZiGGd.213064$Np3.8936865@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
>
>>There was some other guy Ikey somebody.
>>
>>
>>
>>Don Wagner wrote:
>>
>>> wrote in message
>>>news:1105911628.864007.140910@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>>"Press your nose and make a buzzer sound" Glen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>The question was: "How many Presidents have fought in combat in the
>>>>last 200 years?"
>>>>.
>>>>The answer is still "zero". No Presidents have *ever* been in
>>>>combat.
>>>
>>>
>>>In no particular order
>>>
>>>Garfeild
>>>George Bush
>>>Gerald Ford
>>>U.S. Grant
>>>Benjamin Harrison
>>>William Henry Harrison
>>>Rutherford Hayes
>>>Andrew Jackson
>>>John F. Kennedy
>>>A. Lincoln
>>>William Mckinley
>>>James Monroe
>>>Theodore Roosevelt
>>>Zachery Taylor
>>>
>>>Nixon, Ford and Johnson were all in WWII and may or
>>>may not have seen combat
>>>
>>>Jimmy Carter was in the Navy and may have seen service
>>>in Korea
>
>
> Ulysses S. Grant was a 'lead from the front' general, at times, during
> the U.S. Civil War. Some suggest that was only when he was drunk, but I
> think drunk was his normal condition, so that idea can't be correct.
> How that isn't combat action, I don't understand.
>
> Kennedy WAS in the Navy, and saw action in WW2 in the Pacific Theatre.
> See his book "Profiles in Courage" for more info. Or doesn't the poster
> consider naval action to qualify as combat action?
>
> Dwight D. Eisenhower
By God you got de wight ike!
was in military service (army) in both WW1 and WW2.
> He was the top American leader in the European Theatre in WW2, and was
> in the field in WW1 (saw and participated directly in combat action).
> Like Grant, he was later nominated for president (by the Republicans)
> and elected.
>
> Wagner was partially correct ... no American president, while serving as
> president, participated as an armed combatant in combat action (that
> rules out Lincoln's visits to the front). That, however, is probably
> not the interpretation he wanted made about his post.
>
>
>
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|