home  bbs  files  messages ]

      ZZCA4353             can.atlantic.general             3283 messages      

[ previous | next | reply ]

[ list messages | list forums ]

  Msg # 3225 of 3283 on ZZCA4353, Monday 7-14-24, 8:50  
  From: TOPAZ  
  To: ALL  
  Subj: Re: "A FASCIST! POLICE STATE 'behind clo  
 7290c5a5 
 XPost: tor.general, ny.politics, us.politics 
 XPost: mex.politica 
 From: mars1933@hotmail.com 
  
      National Socialist Germany was not different from other countries 
 in regard to free speech laws. The only difference was the right was 
 in power instead of the left. Before Hitler was in power he had a lot 
 of his papers banned. Hitler said: 
  
 "You talk about persecution!" (to an address by the Social Democratic 
 speaker) "I think that there are only a few of us [in our party] here 
 who did not have to suffer persecutions in prison from your side ... 
 You seem to have totally forgotten that for years our shirts were 
 ripped off our backs because you did not like the color . . . In those 
 days, our newspapers were banned and banned and again banned, our 
 meetings were forbidden, and we were forbidden to speak, I was 
 forbidden to speak, for years on. And now you say that criticism is 
 salutary!" 
   Even today most countries do not have free speech. In leftist 
 Germany today people get arrested for doubting the holo story and 
 other things. People in Britain get arrested for politically incorrect 
 speech or writing. Saying that the races are not all equal in 
 intelligence is against the law there. 
  
     The United States has the most free speech but even here it has 
 banned things. At one time the play "Merchant of Venice" was banned in 
 New York because it offended the Jews. People in America were arrested 
 for their beliefs during WWII. All countries did that. 
  
    But the United States does have the most free speech and this was a 
 great idea. Hitler also had a great idea of removing the Jews from 
 controlling the media. If we could combine these two ideas we could 
 have a winning combination. Allowing free speech is not the same as 
 allowing one unelected group to virtually control all of the media. 
 The media is the real power, and a minor post such as President of the 
 United States is like nothing by comparison. Why are we voting for 
 President and not voting for who will control the media? When it comes 
 to owning TV stations it is only money that talks, not morality or 
 virtue. 
  
     In the Jews country, which Americans are giving billions of 
 dollars to, they don't allow non-Jews to own certain media. 
  
    National Socialism was  mainly about things like making Germany for 
 the Germans, and rejecting both Communism and Capitalism. But Free 
 Speech is also a great idea. National Socialists today should make it 
 clear that Free Speech is sacred and that no party should be allowed 
 to change that. 
  
  
  
  
 http://www.ihr.org/     www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/ 
  
 http://www.natvan.com   http://www.nsm88.org 
  
 http://heretical.com/   http://immigration-globalization.blogspot.com/ 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) 

[ list messages | list forums | previous | next | reply ]

search for:

328,065 visits
(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca