
| Msg # 3225 of 3283 on ZZCA4353, Monday 7-14-24, 8:50 |
| From: TOPAZ |
| To: ALL |
| Subj: Re: "A FASCIST! POLICE STATE 'behind clo |
7290c5a5 XPost: tor.general, ny.politics, us.politics XPost: mex.politica From: mars1933@hotmail.com National Socialist Germany was not different from other countries in regard to free speech laws. The only difference was the right was in power instead of the left. Before Hitler was in power he had a lot of his papers banned. Hitler said: "You talk about persecution!" (to an address by the Social Democratic speaker) "I think that there are only a few of us [in our party] here who did not have to suffer persecutions in prison from your side ... You seem to have totally forgotten that for years our shirts were ripped off our backs because you did not like the color . . . In those days, our newspapers were banned and banned and again banned, our meetings were forbidden, and we were forbidden to speak, I was forbidden to speak, for years on. And now you say that criticism is salutary!" Even today most countries do not have free speech. In leftist Germany today people get arrested for doubting the holo story and other things. People in Britain get arrested for politically incorrect speech or writing. Saying that the races are not all equal in intelligence is against the law there. The United States has the most free speech but even here it has banned things. At one time the play "Merchant of Venice" was banned in New York because it offended the Jews. People in America were arrested for their beliefs during WWII. All countries did that. But the United States does have the most free speech and this was a great idea. Hitler also had a great idea of removing the Jews from controlling the media. If we could combine these two ideas we could have a winning combination. Allowing free speech is not the same as allowing one unelected group to virtually control all of the media. The media is the real power, and a minor post such as President of the United States is like nothing by comparison. Why are we voting for President and not voting for who will control the media? When it comes to owning TV stations it is only money that talks, not morality or virtue. In the Jews country, which Americans are giving billions of dollars to, they don't allow non-Jews to own certain media. National Socialism was mainly about things like making Germany for the Germans, and rejecting both Communism and Capitalism. But Free Speech is also a great idea. National Socialists today should make it clear that Free Speech is sacred and that no party should be allowed to change that. http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/ http://www.natvan.com http://www.nsm88.org http://heretical.com/ http://immigration-globalization.blogspot.com/ --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) |
328,065 visits
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca