XPost: calgary.general, can.politics, edm.general 
 XPost: hfx.general, tor.general, van.general 
 XPost: wpg.general 
 From: penny@pen.rhys 
  
 On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:40:40 GMT, LC@dinkerson.com (Ladies Choice) 
 wrote: 
  
 >In article <4pehs1h3afitcrhv2otg5du5vttl2otrhi@4ax.com>, penny@pen.rhys 
 says... 
 >> 
 >>You're resorting to name-calling.  Doesn't that mean you've lost 
 >>whatever argument there is. ;-) 
 >> 
 > 
 >No, it doesn't.  But focusing on a negative affectation such as 'fools' as 
 >a means to discredit an argument, is a strawman fallacy.  Which courses on 
 >argumentation have you taken?  I've taken the Teaching Company's course on 
 >Argumentation, taught by David Zarefsky from Northwestern University.  I 
 highly 
 >recommend it to all usenet clowns who continually make fools of themselves 
 in 
 >these newsgroups. 
  
 My goodness!  You really are a "fool". 
  
 Penny 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)