XPost: calgary.general, can.politics, edm.general
XPost: hfx.general, tor.general, van.general
XPost: wpg.general
From: LC@dinkerson.com
In article , penny@pen.rhys
says...
>
> When you look at it on a continuum of political systems
>from democracy to totalitarianism one sees that it's undoubtedly the
>freest possible system there is.
Totalitarianism is not necessarily in opposition to democracy. Nazi Germany
was effectively a democratic totalitarian state (though democracy was
somewhat
subverted in order to speed things along). Democracy is in opposition to
monarchist and dictatorial regimes. It's unlikely a population operating
under
democracy would elect people that would impliment a totalitarian regime,
but it
happens.
>
>Unfortunately political systems are dynamic and ever changing so
>democracy, in its purest form starts going downhill from the instant
>of its inauguration.
Well usually the people implimenting democracy are revolutionaries, they
have
to believe they are fighting for something much better than it is, in order
to
have the determination to win. That's why democracy has ended up with such
an
inflated reputation.
>
>With the crowning of Harper we shall hear the death knell of any
>semblance of democracy that was left in our system.
>
That's so unlikely that it is blatant fearmongering.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|