XPost: calgary.general, can.politics, edm.general
XPost: hfx.general, tor.general, van.general
XPost: wpg.general, can.talk.guns
From: penny@pen.rhys
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:13:59 GMT, 10x@telu€s.net wrote:
>On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 01:22:29 -0500, penny wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 03:38:46 GMT, 10x@telu€s.net wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 23:11:08 GMT, LC@dinkerson.com (Ladies Choice)
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>In article , 10x@telu€s.net
says...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>And handguns are not used to hunt for food. not that you need to in a
>>>>>>society where it is all done for you.
>>>>>
>>>>>A very small percentage of the handgun bullets fired in Canada are
>>>>>fired at humans. The rest are fired at targets. Just because a person
>>>>>shoots a handgun recreanally does not mean she is practicing to kill
>>>>>people. A golfer swings a club and practices his swing. it doesn't
>>>>>mean he's going to hit someone with a club.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I hope a target shooter is practicing to kill, because the more he
practices,
>>>>the more likely a stray bullet won't hit me when he's out trying to kill
a
>>>>certain person.
>>>
>>>Of the fifty five million shotshells fired from shotguns every year in
>>>Canada very few are fired at human beings.
>>>Of the hundreds of millions of .22 rimfire ammunition fired every
>>>year, very few are fired at human beings.
>>>Even fewer human beings are injured or killed by gunshot wounds in
>>>Canada.
>>
>>But all of that shooting of five million shotshells is useless. It
>>has no purpose. With a knife you can peel a potato, but you can't
>>peel a potato with a gun. An aspirin might cure your pain, but a gun
>>cannot cure pain. . A car can transport you anywhere you want. You
>>can take your children to their after-school hobbies in a car. A gun
>>won't take you anywhere except to a hole in the ground in a coffin or
>>to a hospital trauma ward.
>>
>>Guns are useless.
>
>As are golf clubs, and baseball bats, but folks still use them
>recreartionally and enjoy them.
You are wrong. Golf clubs and baseball bats have uses which guns
don't. The are used recreationally to play team sports, or individual
and team sports. Their purpose is not to shoot and kill or maim.
They are not intrinsically dangerous weapons although they are
sometimes used as dangerous weapons.
>Were you aware that studies in some Northern U.S. states show that
>youth who get firearms safety training and own firearms are far less
>likely to be involved in gangs, or do anything that will result in
>criminal charges.
I'd have to see the statistics on that along with a follow-up showing
how many of them were involved in some kind of illegal shooting
incidents in their lives.
>
>>>To put things in perspective. Non steroidal anti inflamatory
>>>compounds (NSAIDS) kill over 1500 Canadians a year. Many of these
>>>deaths occur while under the care of a physician. And the name of
>>>this NSAID that kills more folks than gun shot, Aspirin...
>>>Using the argument used to ban guns would also ban Aspirin...
>>>
>>>Or you are safer from acts of violence by gun owners thatn you are
>>>from taking medicines in your bathroom.
>>
>>You choose to take aspirin whereas you don't choose to be shot.
>>Medicines have their uses. Many people take aspirin to alleviate a
>>pain, more fool them if they can read and have a computer.
>
>Folks who choose to take aspirin regualarly, or under the supervision
>of a physician to relieve pain run far greater risks than the average
>Canadian from getting shot. Gunshot wounds are extremely rare in
>Canada.
It doesn't alter the fact that people choose for themselves
to take aspirin whether under a doctor's guidance or not. One
doesn't chose to be shot or wounded. It's thrust upon a person by
some third party , or it could be an accident.
There are about four times as many gun shot wounds as there are
homicides. That seems to be a standard number for all homicides
wherever you look.
>
>
>>Guns don't have any uses other than to kill or wound.
>
>Once again you are wrong. A gun shoots a bullet. There are millions of
>bullets fired in Canada every year that are not fired at humans or
>unsafely. When one considers how many times firearms really are used
>in Canada and the very low number of accidents, firarms are very safe.
Guns used in target practices are shooting at inanimate targets and
not people. Those millions of bullets you mention are fired at target
ranges. How many times do you miss when you are firing at an
inanimate target. They have nothing to do with the guns that are used
on the general population and kill hundreds of people year after year.
>
>IT is a human with criminal intent who decides to shoot at other
>humans. Miscreants who have values that allow them to do this will do
>other illegal and immoral things. They should be delt with.
>
Very true. Meanwhile how does the general population know who these
miscreants are. They don't . And that's why to make things more safe
for the general population we have a registration of all guns owned by
everyone in Canada ( when the final foolhardy standouts comply).and
the more stringent licensing of gun owners which kept over 15,000 of
these "miscreants" from having access to legal guns.
If any of them find a legal gun the new punishments will perhaps be
prohibitive.
Penny
>
>take the € out of 10x@telu€s.net to email me
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|