XPost: tor.general, calgary.general, can.politics 
 XPost: edm.general 
 From: edruser@NOSPAMtelus.net 
  
 "Starfire3"  wrote in message 
 news:d8fbft$t55$1@utornnr1pp.grouptelecom.net... 
 > Ivan Gowch wrote: 
 >> On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:11:36 -0400, Sundance  
 >> wrote: 
 >> 
 >>> ...gays, like heterosexuals, have a choice to be sexually 
 >>> promiscuous or NOT, sexual promiscuity is wrong 
 >> 
 >> Who says it's wrong?  Some altar-boy-screwing Catholic priest? 
 > 
 > ...most everyone who isn't morally corrupt would agree with me, 
 > and most of those priests you like to mention where homosexual 
 > pedophiles, which you don't like to mention.  :) 
 > 
  
 Ahh yes, if you disagree with me you are morally corrupt, parroting the 
 logic of the Catholic Church again John?  And you never have produced the 
 statistics proving all the pedophile priests were homosexuals.  Pedophiles 
 are in a class of their own, a very low class indeed. 
  
 Well it is immoral for the Catholic Church to arbitrarily decide that one 
 group of people are acceptable and one is not.  And then expect that a 
 government should follow this code in exclusion of all non-Catholics. 
  
 PV 
 -- 
 "I will not apologize for the Salem Witch Trials as they were far before my 
 time.  I cannot ignore the modern day witch hunt being perpetrated by modern 
 day religion" 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)