home  bbs  files  messages ]

      ZZCA4353             can.atlantic.general             3283 messages      

[ previous | next | reply ]

[ list messages | list forums ]

  Msg # 157 of 3283 on ZZCA4353, Monday 7-14-24, 8:02  
  From: SHAMOO  
  To: BILL  
  Subj: Re: French Language Police  
 XPost: calgary.general, can.general, can.politics 
 XPost: edm.general, hfx.general, mtl.general 
 XPost: tor.general, van.general, wpg.general 
 From: kookpatrol@invalid.org 
  
 "Bill"  wrote in message 
 news:41F163C1.F8C934DB@sympatico.ca... 
 > 
 > 
 > shamoo wrote: 
 > 
 >> "Bill"  wrote in message 
 >> news:41F1588E.71BD22EF@sympatico.ca... 
 >> > 
 >> > 
 >> > gapope@vcn.bc.ca wrote: 
 >> > 
 >> >> Carter  wrote: 
 >> >> C> > Otherwise the only official language of the federal government 
 >> >> would 
 >> >> C> > still be English. That PM stabbed Canada in the back. 
 >> >> C> 
 >> >> C> What a load of unadulterated bullshit.  Get some education, learn 
 >> >> C> about your country so you won't look like a bigoted fool. 
 >> >> C> 
 >> >> C> Canada has had two official languages, English and French, ever 
 >> >> C> since it became a country. 
 >> >> 
 >> >> From our Constitution: 
 >> >> 
 >> >>   IX.--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. 
 >> >>    133. Either the English or the French Language may be used by any 
 >> >>    Person in the Debates of the Houses of the Parliament of Canada and 
 >> >> of 
 >> >>    the Houses of the Legislature of Quebec; and both those Languages 
 >> >>    shall be used in the respective Records and Journals of those 
 >> >> Houses; 
 >> >>    and either of those Languages may be used by any Person or in any 
 >> >>    Pleading or Process in or issuing from any Court of Canada 
 >> >> established 
 >> >>    under this Act, and in or from all or any of the Courts of Quebec. 
 >> >> 
 >> >>    The Acts of the Parliament of Canada and of the Legislature of 
 >> >> Quebec 
 >> >>    shall be printed and published in both those Languages.(66) 
 >> >> 
 >> >> Makes sense that this would be interpreted by the courts, if/when such 
 >> >> was 
 >> >> ever a challenge, as an overall officializing of both languages in 
 >> >> official 
 >> >> matters. . . 
 >> > 
 >> > You miss the point! Article 133 did not officialize anything. It 
 >> > provided 
 >> > permission 
 >> > for both French and English to be used as was described in the article. 
 >> 
 >> We know, you like waste your life on semantics that you twist to fill 
 >> your 
 >> hate filled agenda 
 > 
 > Come on! That's a load of horse shit and you know it. 
 > 
 > There are no "semantics" in the FACT that French was not used as an 
 > official 
 > language of anything, save Quebec, until Trudeau re-wrote the constitution 
 > to 
 > include French as an official language of Canada in 1982.  And you know 
 > it!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 
  
 No, you're wrong. Just because it wasn't used, doesn't mean it wasn't 
 EXPRESSLY permitted. Trudeau didn't give any new rights away in this regard 
 like you are trying to imply, unless you think trudeau wrote the above 
 quoted IX. 133 
  
 I call all "polite" rascists like yourselves by their real names, hatefull 
 bigots.  You're as bad as the french extremists. 
  
 There's no sense in talking to you, even when it's pointed out just how long 
 both languages have been officially used ( because let's be clear jackass, 
 when it says french can be used in the constitution it's pretty "official" ) 
 you go on with your hateon for trudeau and the french in general. 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) 

[ list messages | list forums | previous | next | reply ]

search for:

328,103 visits
(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca