home  bbs  files  messages ]

      ZZCA4353             can.atlantic.general             3283 messages      

[ previous | next | reply ]

[ list messages | list forums ]

  Msg # 140 of 3283 on ZZCA4353, Monday 7-14-24, 8:02  
  From: BILL  
  To: CARTER  
  Subj: Re: French Language Police (1/2)  
 XPost: calgary.general, can.general, can.politics 
 XPost: edm.general, hfx.general, mtl.general 
 XPost: tor.general, van.general, wpg.general 
 From: bill.g@sympatico.ca 
  
 Carter wrote: 
  
 > Bill wrote: 
 > > 
 > > Carter wrote: 
 > > 
 > > 
 > >>Bill wrote: 
 > >> 
 > >>>gapope@vcn.bc.ca wrote: 
 > >>> 
 > >>> 
 > >>> 
 > >>>>"Peter Benyk"  wrote: 
 > >>>>"B> Where did you learn your history-in a quebec school? 
 > >>>>"B> Canada was the result of the English kicking the shit out of the 
 French on 
 > >>>>"B> the PLains of Abraham. 
 > >>>> 
 > >>>>If the English so kicked the shit out of the French, why did they feel 
 the need 
 > >>>>to make so many constitutional concessions to them? 
 > >>> 
 > >>> 
 > >>>There were no concessions made to the french until 1982 (A hundred 
 > >>>and fifteen years after confederation.) and the concessions were made 
 > >>>by a frenchman to accommodate  frenchmen.  That's the only reason. 
 > >>> 
 > >>>Otherwise the only official language of the federal government would 
 > >>>still be English. That PM stabbed Canada in the back. 
 > >> 
 > >>What a load of unadulterated bullshit.  Get some education, learn 
 > >>about your country so you won't look like a bigoted fool. 
 > >> 
 > >>Canada has had two official languages, English and French, ever 
 > >>since it became a country. 
 > >> 
 > >>Carter 
 > > 
 > > 
 > > Grow up and stop trying to shit the troops. 
 > > French was never an official language of Canada! 
 > > 
 > > The Federal government always worked in English because 
 > > this is an English country. 
 > > 
 > > Why do you suppose the French always used the fact that 
 > > the Army was English as an excuse not to have to fight for Canada? 
 > > That's the reason for the french only providing one sixth, per capita, 
 > > of the number of troops that the rest of Canada provided in the 1st 
 > > great war? (5% of the total troops) 
 > > 
 > > You want to learn a little of Canada's history.  You've been listening 
 > > to much to the Quebecois. 
 > > 
 > My God, it's been a long time since anyone as ignorant as you 
 > showed up here.  You must be more than one person because one 
 > person couldn't possibly be that ignorant. 
  
 Sure sure we've all heard that shit before! Now tell us something that you 
 can 
 substantiate! 
  
  
  
 This is a little flash back to the way things were.and the expectation then 
 of 
 giving 
 the french a proportional share in federal positions. 
  
  
 To bad they went all to hell with the situation and now most of the 
 supervisors and key 
 posts in everything federal are filled with francophones. 
  
  
  
  
 NOVEMBER 24, 1977 
 Meeting the Threat at Home and Abroad 
 AN ADDRESS BY The Honourable Barnett Danson, M.P., MINISTER OF NATIONAL 
 DEFENCE 
 CHAIRMAN The President, Peter Hermant 
 MR. HERMANT: 
  
  
 What are these rights that Quebec wants? We know what the separatists 
 want--and nothing 
 we can say or do is likely to change them. And we know what the moderates-- 
 the 
 Quebecois majority--want; at least we know what they've been telling us for 
 years. 
 1. They've said they want a fair share of federal jobs at all levels and 
 equality in 
 our government for their language. In Quebec they want an equal chance for 
 the 
 better-paying jobs, in business, industry and finance. They've said they 
 want 
 more 
 control of immigration to Quebec. They want to keep in touch with other 
 francophone 
 countries. They want to preserve and develop their culture. In short, they 
 want, like 
 everyone else, to feel both secure and free. 
 Can we, the English-speaking majority, help them achieve this? Can we do it 
 without 
 endangering our unity as a nation? I think, I'm sure, we can. I think we 
 will, 
 though 
 we've still some way to go. But I think we've already come a very long way. 
 Twenty years ago, even fifteen years ago, the French-Canadian who came to 
 Ottawa came 
 to a foreign country, a country that didn't understand him and didn't want 
 to. 
 He had 
 to conform to foreign customs. He had to work in a foreign language. If he 
 wanted to 
 write to another French-Canadian in his government, his letter had to be 
 translated 
 into English, answered in English, and then translated back into French. He 
 was made to 
 feel inferior even if he spoke his language well. He couldn't get ahead 
 unless 
 he gave 
 up his French identity, which our constitution guarantees, a situation 
 which, 
 if 
 reversed, we anglophones would not tolerate for a moment. Even then, he 
 always 
 worked 
 at a disadvantage, because public servants are judged mainly on how they 
 express 
 themselves. So the most capable French-Canadians seldom sought a federal 
 career, and 
 then we said that French-Canadians weren't capable. 
 All this has changed. Now French and English have equal status throughout 
 the 
 federal 
 government. Francophones, now 27 per cent of our population, make up 25 per 
 cent of our 
 public service. Their share of jobs is still too low in some cat 
 gories--administrative 
 and foreign service, technical, scientific and professional--but the catchup 
 rate for 
 the past five years is dramatic. At the top, francophones hold 20 per cent 
 of 
 executive 
 positions and their present rate of increase should take them to parity in 
 the 
 early 
 80s without sacrificing the merit principle. 
 It's sometimes said that the military is hidebound, but I think the armed 
 forces 
 illustrate this transformation. During the war I served with a brigade that 
 was half 
 French-speaking, and I managed to become a reasonably effective NCO and 
 officer--thanks 
 to training manuals written in English. But if that wasn't easy for me, what 
 about my 
 French-speaking comrades, who had to use the same training manuals that I 
 did? 
 Even up 
 to the 70s, francophone recruits in the armed forces had to take their basic 
 trades 
 training in English. Their failure rate was 45 per cent, compared with 10 
 per 
 cent for 
 English recruits! 
 Now we give training in French for half of our 96 different trades and the 
 francophone 
 success rate has shot up to 90 per cent. We have seventeen units and a 
 destroyer in 
 which the language of work is French, and another seventeen French units are 
 proposed. 
 All reports and forms and manuals are published in both languages. We handle 
 enquiries 
 and provide services in both languages. We have French-language newspapers 
 and 
 magazines in our messes and French-language books in our libraries. I might 
 add, one of 
 the most distinguished Canadians, one of the most distinguished soldiers in 
 our 
 history, our recently-retired chief of the defence staff, General Dextraze, 
 is 
 an 
 outstanding son of French Canada of whom we should all be proud. 
 We haven't accomplished these changes in the armed forces without some 
 misunderstanding, a feeling that maybe the change has gone a little too far 
 too fast. 
 Well, nobody in the service gets promoted who isn't qualified, but 
 everything 
 else 
 being reasonably equal, yes, some francophones get the nod in categories 
 where 
 they're 
  
 [continued in next message] 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) 

[ list messages | list forums | previous | next | reply ]

search for:

328,121 visits
(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca