XPost: hk.forsale, man.forsale, nyc.forsale 
 XPost: sk.forsale 
  
 MI5 Persecution: How Could It Be True? 
  
 If you have the patience to read these articles you will be struck by how 
 apparently fantastic the claims being put forward are. You may ask 
 yourself why such seemingly nonsensical assertions are made. This matter 
 has been discussed on the Internets UK-local newsgroups for three years 
 now, and the denizens of the uk.misc newsgroup (the so-called 
 "miscreants") have come up with a number of theories to explain these 
 posts; it has been variously suggested that they are a troll (an 
 artificial creation for the amusement of its author), that they are made 
 by MI5 themselves with the purpose of discrediting other conspiracy 
 theories, and that the poster is mentally ill and the articles are 
 symptomatic of the illness (the view held by most miscreants). 
  
 Are these claims the product of mental illness, or is that just a cover? 
  
 The most obvious explanation, that the claims made result from the 
 admitted mental illness of the author, is the one which the persecutors 
 intend be the one accepted without consideration being given to the 
 possibility of the claims being true. The persecutors have actually been 
 very clever about this, both in selecting as their target someone who was 
 known from school or university as being borderline schizophrenic, and in 
 ensuring the nature of their persecution corresponds to what often 
 features in the delusions of a schizophrenic. 
  
 The very first incident of the persecution occurred in June 1990, when I 
 was still a student at university in London. It consisted of a reaction 
 (giggling) from the newsreader, Sue Carpenter of ITN, to what she saw 
 happening in my living-room at my parents home where I was living. Before 
 your imagination gets the better of you I should make clear that what the 
 newsreader was reacting to was not too embarrassing in nature; my mother 
 had brought an apple for me into the the room, and Sue Carpenter found 
 this amusing. 
  
 I recognized that Carpenter had reacted to what she had seen in my 
 living-room, yet this idea still seemed completely fantastic to me. My 
 reaction was to continue watching television, particularly the news, to 
 see if this incident would be repeated. It was, many times, both on BBC 
 and ITV. An intelligent person would have thought to obtain a video 
 recorder and capture some of these incidents in order to try to explain to 
 an observer what he saw in these broadcasts. Unfortunately, I failed this 
 test of intelligence, since I did not record these programmes. I have 
 recently attempted to obtain from ITN tapes of their news programmes 
 dating back to summer 1990, but, unhappily, they have advised me that they 
 do not have complete programmes including newsreaders comments dating back 
 to that period. 
  
 From the outset, the persecutors structured their actions to ensure that 
 any complaint would be met with disbelief, and dismissed as 
 delusional. This is why they chose as their target someone who was known 
 at school and university to be borderline mentally ill; and it is why they 
 fired the first shots of their campaign through the broadcast 
 media. Schizophrenics commonly believe the media harass them; it would be 
 exceptional for "full-duplex television" to exist in reality. Those with 
 schizophrenia also commonly believe people are talking about them; again, 
 the persecutors have shown themselves very rarely, but act through 
 intermediaries, both in the workplace, and in public and during travel. 
  
 Mental illness is not the cause of these claims, but the simulation of its 
 symptoms is a cover used by the persecutors to deny their victim the 
 ability to have his compaints believed. 
  
 What evidence exists to support these claims of "interactive 
 television/radio";? 
  
 Quite frankly, I have very little evidence to support my claims. You may 
 examine the "Evidence" area of my website to see such evidence as I have 
 been able to gather. None of it is remotely conclusive. The "smoking 
 guns" all date back to 1990/91, and it is really rather late now to start 
 trying to look for material dating back seven or eight years. In 1997 I 
 started tape-recording every programme I watched or listened to. I also 
 started carrying with me a high-fidelity minidisc-recorder with good 
 quality microphone to catch incidents of public harassment, but this also 
 has not been as successful or conclusive as I had hoped. 
  
 Perhaps the best item in the "Evidence" section is the audio file "Life is 
 so hard" (it is labelled with Garfield the cartoon character on the site), 
 which I have given a certainty level of 100%. This item relates to 
 harassment at my workplace in Canada in 1996. A co-worker called Mark was 
 coming up with phrases and expressions which were repeating things being 
 said at my Canadian residence, consequently leading me to believe that my 
 apartment and home phone were bugged, and that the persecutors were 
 passing their gathered information on to Mark. On one particular evening I 
 said in my apartment, "life is so hard, and then you die". The following 
 day I was able to record Mark saying exactly the same phrase at work. 
  
 Unfortunately when "they" know you are recording them, they simply dont 
 say things which would unambiguously show harassment. When Mark the 
 co-worker knew he was being recorded, he only made his remarks out of 
 range of the recorder, for example outside the building. When the TV 
 newscasters or radio disc jockeys know they are being taped, they limit 
 themselves to saying things which are ambiguous, which even in my mind may 
 or may not be personally directed against me. 
  
 Who knows about this persecution? 
  
 Surprisingly many people know. People in the media, such as BBC and ITN 
 newscasters including Martyn Lewis and Michael Buerk, and radio disc 
 jockeys such as Chris Tarrant of Capital Radio, know what is going on, and 
 take part in it. Some co-workers at my former workplaces in England and 
 Canada have known about the harassment. Quite a few people in the general 
 public are also included. I believe the police are aware of the 
 persecution, but, unfortunately, have chosen not to take any action to 
 stop it. I have complained at my local police station in London several 
 years ago, and I have stated on the internet newsgroups that I have done 
 so, hence the police will be well aware of my wish to see the matter 
 resolved. I believe their inaction denotes a dereliction of duty, but 
 without good evidence, I am powerless to compel them to take steps to 
 prevent further harassment, or deal with what has already taken place. 
  
 What is the purpose of sending these faxes? 
  
 These faxes are being sent to three distinct groups of people, namely 
 Members of Parliament, the media, and diplomats & legal people. As you 
 will have observed I am making use of the email-to-fax gateway at Demon 
 Internet to send these faxes. I am forced to use this gateway since I 
 currently live in North America, and cannot afford the high cost of direct 
 phone calls to the UK. 
  
  
 [continued in next message] 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)