XPost: hk.forsale, man.forsale, nyc.forsale 
 XPost: sk.forsale 
  
 MI5 Persecution Update: Friday 25 March, 1999 
  
 If You Intend To Reply, Please Read This 
 Please.... keep your response to one page if you can!. Faxes over a page 
 or two will be deleted without being read. 
  
 The Usual Words 
  
 The persecutors-who-wont-admit-theyre-MI5 have been active again this 
 week. On Saturday 20/3/99 I visited Ravenscourt Park in west London, and 
 was verbally assaulted with the usual words, "something wrong with 
 him". This audio file is on the web at URL; 
  
 This afternoon (Friday 26/March) I was again verbally assaulted while 
 travelling by bus. The same sexual obscenity was thrown at me, and the 
 incident was recorded on my minidisc-walkman. Because of the deeply 
 offensive nature of the slander, I will not be posting this on the 
 website. 
  
 Keith Hill MP (Labour - Streatham), my elected representative, as ever 
 refuses to help. 
  
  
 MI5 Persecution : Browse Website 
  
 The March 1998 issue (number 42) of .net Magazine reviews the website 
 describing it as an "excellent site". Since August 11, 1996 over 50,000 
 people have browsed this website. 
  
 You are encouraged to read the web pages which include 
  
 a FAQ (frequently asked questions) section outlining the nature of the 
 persecutors, their methods of harassment through the media, people at work 
 and among the general public 
  
 an evidence section, which carries audio and video clips of media and 
 workplace harassment, rated according to how directly I think they refer to 
 me 
  
 objective descriptions of the state security agencies involved 
  
 scanned texts of the complaints I have made to media and state security 
 agencies involved 
  
 posts which have been made to netnews over the last four years on this topic 
  
 This article outlines what is to be found on the webpages, which you are 
 encouraged to browse for the complete story. 
  
 Frequently Asked Questions 
  
 Your excursion through the website starts with the "FAQ - Frequently Asked 
 Questions" portion. MI5s campaign of harassment against me has been going 
 on for almost 9 years, and its longevity and breadth is reflected in the 
 FAQ. Many thousands of people in Britain and abroad, including some 
 recipients of this fax, have known for many years of MI5s activities 
 against me. The FAQ describes the mass "Omerta suppressing its 
 publication"; we pretend Britain is part of the "Free World", yet the 
 British Secret Police, which is what MI5 are, carry on for many years a 
 campaign which politicians and the media know about, and rely on the 
 silent complicity of so many thousands of people. 
  
 The FAQs introductory article names those who are "in the know"; media 
 figures like Martyn Lewis, Michael Buerk, entertainment figures like Chris 
 Tarrant, politicians and many in the general public, "all united in a 
 conspiracy which breaks the laws which the UK does have regarding 
 harassment, and all completely uncaring for any semblance of decency or 
 elementary respect for individual rights. 
  
 Broadcast media play a key role in the harassment. The very first incident 
 in June 1990 was when a television newsreader reacted to what she saw 
 happen in my living room at home; such incidents of "interactive 
 television" are still happening in 1999. The same goes for radio stations 
 such as Capital FM. In spring 1994, Chris Tarrant on his Capital morning 
 show made an aside to someone else in the studio, about a person he didn't 
 identify. He said, "You know this bloke? He says we're trying to kill 
 him. We should be done for attempted manslaughter". Tarrant and Capital 
 have made strenuous efforts to avoid answering this charge. 
  
 Perhaps worst of all, MI5 have deliberately set-up many incidents in 
 public places such as tube stations, shops, cinemas, where they have paid 
 people to throw abuse at me. Since MI5 obtains funds to the tune of 160 
 million a year to fund its criminal activities, it has funds both to pay 
 its operatives and to "buy" media figures and members of the public to 
 take part in its campaign of persecution. 
  
 The Security Service are professional liars. They throw slanderous abuse, 
 yet they refuse to admit out loud that they are doing so. When challenged 
 about their activities through the Security Service Tribunal they lie and 
 deny their activities. They induce other workers and managers at places of 
 employment to take part in their campaign of abuse, presumably by buying 
 them in the same way they buy media figures. 
  
 Complaints, and Press Coverage (BBC Lies, MI5 Lies) 
  
 As you might expect I have challenged both the Security Service, through 
 the Security Service Tribunal, and offending broadcasters, to own up to 
 what they have been doing. And as you might also expect, all of these 
 people have lied through their teeth. Still worse, they have refused to 
 commit unambiguous lies on paper; they have couched their lies in 
 bureaucratic language, and allowed others to make false assurances and 
 tell lies on their behalf. So when their lies are exposed, they will then 
 tell further Clintonesque lies about how they werent really telling lies 
 in the first place! 
  
 On 6/Feb/1997 the BBC told me they would "never engage in any form of 
 surveillance activity such as you describe". The BBC told me Buerk and 
 Lewis had refused to put their lies in writing, but had stated verbal 
 falsehoods denying my accusations of "interactive watching" during news 
 broadcasts. Clearly Buerk and Lewis fear being caught and exposed, so they 
 hide behind their Viewer Correspondence department. 
  
 In March 1997 I issued a summons against the BBC to try to "smoke them 
 out". This summons was struck out as "disclosing no reasonable cause of 
 action", because I had acted as a Litigant-in-Person and most LiP summons 
 are treated thus. My case was arguable in law, so the striking out was 
 unjust. 
  
 In June 1997 the Security Service Tribunal wrote to me regarding the 
 complaint I had brought against MI5 in February. They say, "The Security 
 Service Tribunal have now investigated your complaint and have asked me to 
 inform you that no determination in your favour has been made on your 
 complaint." I think you can guess the contempt which I feel for the 
 Security Service Tribunal, who have never made a determination against 
 MI5, and act as merely a whitewashing body for the Security 
 Service. Unsurprisingly in May 1997 the Interception of Communications 
 Tribunal gave the same result. 
  
 The last few items of "Press Coverage" give details of mentions of the MI5 
 Persecution in various magazines and newspapers such as BBCs Ariel, the 
 Observer and .net magazine. 
  
 Evidence 
  
 Some audio and video clips of evidence have been recorded. My weakness in 
 this area is because most of the really unambiguous evidence would have 
 been obtainable in 1990-92, but I wasnt taping anything at the time, and 
 its very difficult to now obtain recordings from that period. 
  
 The audio clip "Life is so Hard" relates to harassment at my workplace in 
 Canada. In the latter half of 1996, I was sitting near to co-worker Mark 
 Lee, who kept coming out with words and phrases which showed MI5 were 
  
 [continued in next message] 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)