home  bbs  files  messages ]

      ZZCA4352             can.atlantic.forsale             5294 messages      

[ previous | next | reply ]

[ list messages | list forums ]

  Msg # 5143 of 5294 on ZZCA4352, Monday 7-14-24, 9:24  
  From: MI5-VICTIM@MI5.GOV.UK  
  To: ALL  
  Subj: MI5-Persecution: Comparing the MI5 Perse  
 XPost: hk.forsale, man.forsale, nyc.forsale 
 XPost: sk.forsale 
  
 MI5 Persecution Update: Friday 16 April, 1999 
  
 If You Intend To Reply, Please Read This 
 Please.... keep your response to one page!. Faxes over a page or two will 
 be deleted without being read. 
  
 BBC newscaster Nicholas Witchell cant stop himself laughing 
  
 During 1990-91 there were very many instances of "interactive 
 television" where newscasters and other TV presenters saw on a screen 
 before them what was happening in my home, and reacted, frequently by 
 laughing at me. During this period I unfortunately did not record these 
 programmes. For the last year or two, I have been recording everything I 
 watch, and there has been a drastic decrease in such incidents. 
  
 However, on occasion, television presenters do still engage in 
 "interactive watching" and react to what they see. This has been evident 
 with Jon Snow of Channel Four News recently - a particularly interesting 
 case, since it has been established that he cannot be corrupted by money 
 (it is well-documented that MI5 offered him a tax-free salary and he 
 turned them down). I wonder what device MI5 are using to encourage him to 
 do the "interactive watching"? 
  
 On Saturday 10 April 1999 at 7pm, Nicholas Witchell on BBC2 News reacted 
 when he saw that I was watching the programme, and I have his reactions 
 stored safely on videotape. I have watched this tape several times and I 
 am entirely confident that my evaluation of his reactions is correct. For 
 several minutes his upper lip quivered in mirth as he attempted to keep a 
 straight face. Then finally his self-control evaporated through the excuse 
 of a weak joke and his face collapsed into a grin. 
  
 The strange thing is that I dont know why he was laughing at me, what I 
 had done recently to "deserve" to be laughed at. The MI5 persecutors 
 usually manage to invent some justification as to why people should laugh 
 at and/or abuse me ("hes an X", "it was so funny" etc), so Mr Witchell 
 could have been laughing for any number of reasons. Perhaps he found the 
 views I have been expressing in these articles amusing? I suppose if youre 
 paid enough money and ordered to laugh then even the most innocuous thing 
 becomes funny. 
  
 Jon Snow of Channel Four News cant stop himself smirking, either. 
  
 On 12 February 1999 I was watching Channel Four News presented by Jon 
 Snow. As usual, I was recording the programme, so that if anything out of 
 the ordinary happened, Id be able to go back and watch it again. 
  
 Now, Jon Snow, by his own claim, is uncorruptible. He says he turned down 
 an offer of a substantial tax-free salary from MI5 - they wanted to make 
 him their mouthpiece, and he told them where to get off. 
  
 So you will be most surprised to learn that Jon Snow "interactively 
 watched" me that evening, and on many other evenings. Approximately 
 fifteen minutes into the programme, he announced that the US President 
 would be making a live appearance at about 7.30pm; I looked at the clock 
 on the mantelpiece; and Snow saw me looking at the clock, and visibly 
 tried to suppress a smirk. 
  
 Uncorruptible, are you, Mister Snow? If not money, then why are you 
 watching me, Mister Snow? Are they forcing you to watch me? Cant you turn 
 the monitor off, Mister Snow? 
  
 Keith Hill MP (Labour - Streatham), my elected representative, as ever 
 refuses to help. 
  
 Comparing the MI5 Persecution with German "Final Solution" 
  
 It might seem offensive to compare the mass murder of millions of 
 civilians in wartime with the peacetime persecution of merely one 
 person. Yet the comparison has been coursing through my mind for several 
 years now, because the brutality of German intent to "sub-humans" is very 
 much comparable to the brutality of British intent to someone they 
 vituperate and term "not up to British standards". The methods may differ, 
 but the persecutors mindset is the same. 
  
 The Germans first targeted the mentally disabled, too 
  
 During WW2 millions of ethnic Russians, Poles, Jews, mentally ill, gypsies 
 and other minorities were rounded up and murdered in purpose-built camps 
 by the German regime, in the name of "racial superiority". Fifty years on, 
 the British Secret Police, MI5, instituted a campaign of mass 
 hysteria; but in their cowardice, limited their activities to one single 
 victim. 
  
 It is instructive to note that the early German "cleansing" effort was 
 directed primarily not at Jews, but at the mentally ill. The Nazis set up 
 the T4 project in the thirties to "cleanse" away 70,000 mentally disabled 
 people, including schizophrenics and epileptics. After WW2 the Jews with 
 their media influence used the reaction from the holocaust to roll back 
 anti-semitism in the Western countries; however, the mentally ill are 
 today still a persecuted group in the modern Western world as they were 
 under the Nazis (the current Jewish home secretary in the UK intends to 
 bring in laws for incarceration without any criminal charge for some 
 mentally ill people - he protects his own minority, but does nothing for 
 the other minorities in todays society), and this continuing bias forms a 
 central cause for the current acts of persecution in the UK. 
  
 Widespread knowledge of what is happening to the "un-British" minority 
  
 In both the German persecution of the thirties and early forties, and the 
 current British persecution, many, many people are well aware of whats 
 happening. There is widespread complicity through inaction of 
 populace; and in a substantial proportion of the mainstread population, 
 the persecution had/has widespread enthusiastic support; yet in both the 
 German case in the 1940s and the British today, the existence of 
 persecution is a mass secret which must be never admitted out loud. In the 
 recent Lawrence case this "secret bigotry" has been termed 
 "institutionalised racism", and that is a very good word for what the 
 British are doing today The persecutory attitudes and omerta regarding 
 them are so deeply ingrained in the national psyche that they define the 
 national mood 
  
 During WW2 many Germans knew minorities were disappearing, and through 
 inaction quietly condoned their government's mass murder of 
 "un-German" minorities and inferior "foreigners"; and in the 1990s, 
 similarly, many English people know what the MI5 British Secret Police 
 have been doing, and not only condone it, but actively take part, because 
 of xenophobia against the "un-British" unit minority that is the target of 
 "British" actions. This attitude by the British persecutors has been made 
 explicit through the words "he's not up to British standards"; the British 
 seem to have found their very own "untermenschen" to victimise. 
  
 Why these obsessive "holy wars" happen 
  
 This type of aggression occurs when the majority is threatened or 
 humiliated in some way, economically, militarily or culturally. In pre-WW2 
 Germany the threat was primarily economic and military, following 
 Germany's humiliating defeat in the first world war and the reparations it 
 was forced to pay. In modern Britain, one might guess that the majority 
  
 [continued in next message] 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) 

[ list messages | list forums | previous | next | reply ]

search for:

328,100 visits
(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca