
| Msg # 72 of 1759 on ZZCA4349, Friday 9-11-25, 3:06 |
| From: UBIQUITOUS |
| To: THETRUEMELISSA@GMAIL.COM |
| Subj: Re: AI/LLM reviews of STNG - Darmok |
XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.startrek.current, rec.arts.startrek.fandom XPost: rec.arts.startrek.misc, rec.arts.sf.tv From: weberm@polaris.net thetruemelissa@gmail.com wrote: > weberm@polaris.net delivered unto us this message: >> thetruemelissa@gmail.com wrote: >>> anim8rfsk@cox.net wrote: >>>> You couldn?t possibly develop a language like that naturally. You'd >>>> have to start with a real language and then change it just to be >>>> annoying. >>> >>>I'm not so sure about "couldn't possibly." They would need to learn the >>>stories somehow, but (according to the fan wiki) the official position >>>is that they *mostly* speak in metaphor. Children presumably learn some >>>basics in plainer language, which really should have been tried with >>>Picard, but a highly metaphorical species might not have thought of it. >> >> It's been discussed before (and better), but you cannot have a language >> that is _entirely_ memes. > >That's probably why the "mostly" part is in there. It might as well be "entirely" if you're unable to explain the meme you're using. --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) |
328,082 visits
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca