[continued from previous message] 
  
 >>>> Fans are torn: some find it a creepy and memorable horror outing, 
 >>>> while others criticize the dream sequences and lack of narrative 
 >>>> finesse. 
 >>>> ([Jammer's Reviews][4], [IMDb][6], [Late to the Game Blog][5]) 
 >>>> 
 >>>> --- 
 >>>> 
 >>>> ## Final Rating: **7 / 10** 
 >>>> 
 >>>> **Verdict:** *Night Terrors* is a bold, atmospheric experiment for 
 >>>> *TNG*, doubling down on sleeper horror within a Star Trek context. Its 
 >>>> strengths lie in unsettling visuals and psychological dread 
 €€€€€€€uncommon 
 >>>> for the series. However, the undercooked dream imagery and narrative 
 >>>> thinness dilute its effectiveness. At its best, it's a creepy 
 >>>> standout; at its weakest, it€€€€€€€€s a drawn-out oddity. 
 >>>> 
 >>> 
 >>> Interesting, using a llm to review a 30+ year old episode, an era where 
 >>> shows weren't serialized like they are today. 
 >>> 
 >>> how do you develop lore for a 40 minute episode? 
 >>> 
 >>> 
 >> 
 >> See €€€Datalore€€€ 
 > 
 > What about it? 
 > 
  
 They developed lore in a 46 minute episode 
  
 -- 
 The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list. 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)