55a9cd9d 
 XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.drwho, uk.media.tv.sf.drwho 
 XPost: rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.sf.fandom 
 From: weberm@polaris.net 
  
 anim8rfsk@cox.net wrote: 
 >Ubiquitous  wrote: 
 >> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote: 
 >>> Ubiquitous   wrote: 
 >>>> In article , mike@xenocyte.com wrote: 
 >>>>> anim8rfsk  wrote: 
 >>>>>> Arthur Lipscomb  wrote: 
  
 >>>>>>> 5 out of 10 seems a bit low for an episode you seemed to like. 
 >>>>>> 
 >>>>>> I'd give it an eight except for the ending which I€€€€€€d give a zero. 
 >>>>> 
 >>>>> On another review thread I posted: 
 >>>>> 
 >>>>> This could have been a wonderful mystical story. It was well acted and 
 >>>>> directed and held the attention from beginning to end - but the story 
 is 
 >>>>> just complete bollocks. I don't know how to rate it - going to have to 
 >>>>> split the difference between its dramatic quality (8/10) and its plot 
 >>>>> value (0/10) and give it 4 
 >>>> 
 >>>> If you watch it a second time (horrors!), both scores will be lower 
 >>>> because youy'll catch all the stupid things you missed the first time. 
 >>> 
 >>> I try to be generous! 
 >>> 
 >>> Gatwa is 2 steps better than Whittaker. 
 >> 
 >> That's very generous! LOL! 
 > 
 >Not really. Whittaker is by far the worst Doctor ever with Crapaldi (when 
 >he's not being saved by the impossibly cute Clara) a close second. 
  
 It's almost as if some idiot thought "Hey! I bet we'd get more women viewers 
 if we made the main char female!". 
  
 -- 
 Let's go Brandon! 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)