home  bbs  files  messages ]

      ZZCA4349             can.arts.sf             1759 messages      

[ previous | next | reply ]

[ list messages | list forums ]

  Msg # 1482 of 1759 on ZZCA4349, Monday 7-14-24, 8:10  
  From: THE DOCTOR  
  To: MIKE@XENOCYTE.COM  
  Subj: Re: Doctor Who Space Babies review with   
 XPost: rec.arts.drwho, uk.media.tv.sf.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv 
 XPost: rec.arts.tv 
 From: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca 
  
 In article , 
 The Last Doctor   wrote: 
 >The Doctor  wrote: 
 >> In article , 
 >> The Last Doctor   wrote: 
 >>> Not The Doctor  wrote: 
 >>>> The Last Doctor   wrote: 
 >>>>> Not The Doctor  wrote: 
 >>>>>> The Last Doctor   wrote: 
 >>>>>>> Not The Doctor  wrote: 
 >>>>>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
 >>>>>>> This is a lie Dave, isn€€€t it? You didn€€€t write this. It€€€s AI 
 >>> generated 
 >>>>>>> spaff. 
 >>>>>>> 
 >>>>>>> It€€€s full of errors (which is a bit like you) but is coherent and 
 >>>>>>> grammatically correct (which is not at all like you). And it 
 >spots lots of 
 >>>>>>> things that you never would. 
 >>>>>>> 
 >>>>>> 
 >>>>>> You hate changes of style? 
 >>>>> 
 >>>>> I love changes of style. But if you wrote one of your usual incoherent 
 >>>>> point-by-points, I doubt CoPilot or whatever you used would be able to 
 >>>>> polish your turd that far. I€€€d be delighted to be proved wrong - care 
 to 
 >>>>> post what you fed into the AI engine so we can see? 
 >>>>> 
 >>>>> You€€€ve not written anything that coherent in this group - ever. 
 >And it€€€s 
 >>>>> packed solidly with tells that it€€€s an AI composited screed. 
 >>>> 
 >>>> CoPilot is a huge security! [risk, I infer] 
 >>> 
 >>> It€€€s a security risk if you use the public version to compose text 
 based 
 on 
 >>> privileged material. The risk is to the confidentiality of information, 
 >>> though, not to your computer. Companies can have private instances of 
 >>> CoPilot that have access to the public body of information to drive their 
 >>> learning, but ring fence any material fed in from the company. 
 >>> 
 >>> But you€€€re still evading: what AI did this come from and did you give 
 it 
 >>> any input other than a target score, and if so what did YOU write? 
 >>> 
 >>>>>>>> 6/10 
 >>>>>>> 
 >>>>>>> Is that your rating, or is the AI a bigger fanboi than you? 
 >>>>>> 
 >>>>>> Mine, so what is yours? 
 >>>>> 
 >>>>> I€€€ll give my thoughts in due course. And I won€€€t run them through 
 an 
 AI 
 >>>>> bot. It€€€s fine if you need that crutch. But you really should 
 acknowledge 
 >>>>> that it€€€s by no means your own work. 
 >>>> 
 >>>> You just watched it and you cannot beat AGA into a review? 
 >>> 
 >>> 1. It€€€s not a race. First review is almost never the best: case in 
 point 
 >>> you, who must be typing instead of watching normally, and now are just 
 >>> accepting any old AI generated crap and tagging on a rating. 
 >>> 
 >>> 2. For me I need to watch at least twice before giving my thoughts: once 
 >>> just to watch it and see if I enjoy it, then again to spot nuances. And 
 in 
 >>> this case, I also need to re-watch €€€The Church on Ruby Road€€€ before 
 >>> commenting. 
 >>> 
 >>> 3. The episode, in conjunction with its purpose for the series and the 
 >>> season, was more complex than it appears on the surface. Takes a while to 
 >>> put down my thoughts sometimes. 
 >>> 
 >>> 4. I doubt Aggie gave a real review any more than you have. By the time 
 >>> you€€€ve removed the vitriolic rhetoric about €€€degenerate crap for 
 >>> illiterates€€€ I suspect there is virtually nothing left. Guessing it 
 got a 
 >>> 0/10 from him? Did he at least tell us whether he is a homosexual, a 
 >>> transvestite, or both, (his only choices, as earlier this week he told us 
 >>> that only such people could watch the show, and yet it seems he has 
 watched 
 >>> it)? 
 >>> 
 >> 
 >> Yes about 0/10 and you did not read. 
 > 
 >Of course I didn€€€t read it. I have the loon permanently kill filed. I€€€ve 
 >got no interest in his moronic racist homophobic screeds and the utter 
 >certainty he has that his tiny mind€€€s viewpoint is the only thing right 
 >with the world. I only see the parts of what he€€€s vomited out that others 
 >respond to: that€€€s quite enough for me, thanks. 
 > 
  
 I might quote him more often. 
  
 >-- 
 >€€€The timelines and €€€ canon €€€ are rupturing€€€ - the Doctor 
  
  
 -- 
 Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca 
 Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist 
 rising! 
 Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) 

[ list messages | list forums | previous | next | reply ]

search for:

328,098 visits
(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca