home  bbs  files  messages ]

      ZZCA4349             can.arts.sf             1759 messages      

[ previous | next | reply ]

[ list messages | list forums ]

  Msg # 1419 of 1759 on ZZCA4349, Monday 7-14-24, 8:09  
  From: THE DOCTOR  
  To: ALL  
  Subj: Google Gemini reviews Doctor Who An Unea  
 XPost: rec.arts.drwho, uk.media.tv.sf.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv 
 XPost: rec.arts.tv 
 From: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca 
  
 I can provide you with some reviews and insights into  "Doctor Who: An 
 Unearthly Child"  to help you form your own opinion: 
  
  Background 
  
 "An Unearthly Child" is the very first serial of Doctor Who, originally 
 airing 
 in four parts in November 1963.  It introduces viewers to the Doctor, his 
 granddaughter Susan, and the companions Ian Chesterton and Barbara Wright. 
 The serial is a historical adventure, landing the TARDIS in prehistoric 
 Earth. 
  
 Review 
  
 While critical reception of  "An Unearthly Child"  has softened over time, 
 it's important to consider the context of its era. 
 Here's a breakdown of some key points: 
  
 Groundbreaking for Television:  For its time,  "An Unearthly Child"  was 
 a groundbreaking show.  The concept of a time-traveling alien was original, 
 and the serial tackled social issues  like classism 
 that were rarely seen on television at the time. 
  
 Slow Pace by Modern Standards:  Viewers accustomed to the fast-paced action 
 of 
 modern Doctor Who might find  "An Unearthly Child"  slow.  The dialogue can 
 be 
 exposition-heavy, and the plot unfolds gradually. 
  
 Characters Still Developing:  The Doctor, Susan, Ian, and Barbara were all 
 introduced in this serial.  Their personalities and dynamics are still being 
 established,  which can feel underdeveloped compared to later seasons. 
  
 Historical Accuracy (or Lack Thereof):  The portrayal of prehistoric 
 humanity 
 in  "An Unearthly Child"  is not entirely accurate by today's standards. 
 However,  historical accuracy wasn't a major focus of the show in its early 
 days. 
  
 Reception 
  
 Positive:  Praised for its originality,  themes,  and  introduction of the 
 TARDIS and the Doctor. 
  
 Negative:  Criticised for its slow pace,  dialogue,  and  lack of historical 
 accuracy. 
  
 Overall Thoughts 
  
 "An Unearthly Child"  holds historical significance as the birth of Doctor 
 Who. 
 While it might not hold up entirely by modern standards,  it's a valuable 
 piece 
 of television history  that laid the foundation for one of the longest- 
 running 
 science fiction shows ever. 
  
  Would I recommend watching it?: 
  
 If you're a die-hard Doctor Who fan or interested in television history, 
 "An Unearthly Child" is a must-watch.  However,  if you're new to the show 
 and prefer fast-paced action adventures,  you might want to start with a 
 later 
 serial. 
 -- 
 Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca 
 Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist 
 rising! 
 Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be 
 seen 
 What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness?  -unknown 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) 

[ list messages | list forums | previous | next | reply ]

search for:

328,098 visits
(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca