XPost: rec.arts.drwho, rec.arts.sf.fandom, uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
XPost: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv
From: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
In article ,
Dorothy J Heydt wrote:
>In article ,
>Daniel65 wrote:
>>The Last Doctor wrote on 28/11/23 8:49 pm:
>>> Daniel65 wrote:
>>>> Dorothy J Heydt wrote on 28/11/23 4:21 am:
>>>>> In article , The True Doctor
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On 23/11/2023 18:26, Tim Merrigan wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 21:46:36 +0000, The True Doctor
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 22/11/2023 20:12, Tim Merrigan wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 14:12:28 +0000, The True Doctor
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Retarded thinking by degenerate patronizing woke
>>>>>>>>>> hypocrites and bigots who no body asked for them to be
>>>>>>>>>> represented by.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Make up your mind, is it "woke" or bigoted? (What
>>>>>>>>> people appear to object to most about "woke" is that it's
>>>>>>>>> not bigoted.)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's both woke and bigoted. That's how the conjunction
>>>>>>>> 'and' works. If I'd wanted to make it optional I would have
>>>>>>>> said 'or'.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> five specials and an 8 episode season in the can
>>>>>>>>>>> already and production is underway on the 2025
>>>>>>>>>>> season), so we can either learn to live with it and
>>>>>>>>>>> accept the show for what it now is, or move on.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Doctor Who ended in 2017. Other people will continue
>>>>>>>>>> it from where it ended. RTD isn't making anything for
>>>>>>>>>> the viewers, and neither was Chibnall. They're only
>>>>>>>>>> making stuff for their own woke degenerate egos.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thus speaketh the fanatic who thinks canon should follow
>>>>>>>>> his fanfics.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My fan fic. was better written than both Chibnall's and
>>>>>>>> Davies's, based on real canon, and had an able bodied
>>>>>>>> Davros creating the Dalek travel machines so shouldn't you
>>>>>>>> be prizing it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jodie Whittaker's Doctor IS real canon at this point. It's
>>>>>>> not up to you, or anyone outside the production and publicity
>>>>>>> staff at BBC, to decide otherwise. What you're talking about
>>>>>>> is fanfic.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Whittaker is not canon and neither is anything derived from
>>>>>> the Timeless Child monster era. Doctor Who therefore ended in
>>>>>> 2017 and is irrevivable unless the Timeless Child monster is
>>>>>> erased.
>>>>>
>>>>> [Hal Heydt] Who died and made you the arbiter of canon?
>>>>>
>>>> We've been waiting quite some time to get the answer to that
>>>> question, Dorothy.
>>>
>>> That€€€s Dorothy€€€s husband Hal engaging, Daniel (hence the tag). At
>>> least until Aggie€€€s absurdities exhaust his patience. Dorothy passed
>>> last year.
>>>
>>Ah!! Sorry! With the surname 'Heydt' I guessed a non-English speaking
>>poster, so thought the 'Hal' might have been from that other language.
>>
>>Sorry, Hal. Sorry for not realising you weren't Dorothy .... and sorry
>>for her passing (even though I didn't know her) .... but I guess that'll
>>come to us all, sooner or later!
>
>[Hal Heydt]
>I'm not upset about the mistake.
>
>A couple of bits of history... The eponymous Heydt was Karl Otto
>Heydt who came to the US from Prussia to avoid being drafted to
>fight in the Franco-Prussian War of 1870.
>
>When we were married, Dorothy cheerfully change her surname from
>Jones to Heydt because she had found over the years that a
>surprising number of people could neither spell nor pronounce
>Jones. (Go figure.) Likewise, because of the same issue with
>Heydt, when our daughter was married, she changed her surname to
>that of her husband, Creelman. She has since found...the same
>issue.
Languages and cultures come to mind.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist
rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be
seen
Merry Christmas 2023 and Happy New year 2024 Beware https://mindspring.com
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|