XPost: alt.os.windows2000
From: me@privacy.net
Agreed, for the average user, they might not be able to find these
files. However, I knew of all these files, and the tricks with the
system attribute and the INI file. It remains to be seen why these
files need to be marked as system or "secret", as they are junk files
for the most part and can be removed and recreated easily.
--
Best regards,
Kyle
"Kurt" wrote in message
news:10fgctgfhcnlb31@corp.supernews.com...
|
| See the link to the article in the reply to the post above. I'm not
making
| this stuff up! Go see for yourself.
|
| "Kylesb" wrote in message
| news:2lno6hFelnr2U1@uni-berlin.de...
| > which hidden folders are you referring to? The browser cache files
are
| > readily found, and cleared. Caching of web pages is a feature of
all
| > modern web browsing programs, including Mozilla, Opera, Netscape
etc.
| > Cookie files are also a typical feature of web browsers.
| >
| > I do agree that the execution of code in response to a click on a
URL
| > is annoying at best.
| >
| > --
| > Best regards,
| > Kyle
| > "Kurt" wrote in message
| > news:10fc15q42ilf1d8@corp.supernews.com...
| > |
| > | Granted. Macro-viruses, email viruses and any other that a user
| > knowingly
| > | invites in are their own fault. But a virus that gets in via an
RPC
| > hole or
| > | just by clicking a URL in a browser is totally unacceptable. I'm
not
| > saying
| > | they are all deliberate, but I see Microsoft's policies of
storing
| > deleted
| > | items indefinitely in well hidden folders as good reason to
suspect
| > that
| > | they also have means to access that information (after reading
an
| > article on
| > | where to find them and being astounded at what I found, it took
my
| > computer
| > | over 20 minutes to delete stuff I thought I'd alread deleted).
Maybe
| > I'm
| > | just paranoid, but I still think some of the "holes" may be
| > engineered
| > | access.
| > |
| >
|
|
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|