XPost: talk.origins 
 From: observa_no_spam@xtra.co.nz 
  
 "r norman"  wrote in message 
 news:6k4fk0hd8p62g8bjvrb8shp0gl034au5oq@4ax.com... 
 > On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 21:59:21 +0000 (UTC), "Alan Jeffery" 
 >  wrote: 
 > 
 > > 
 > >"r norman"  wrote in message 
 > >news:0oodk0d46rf0j0jqng0hr6otngro5qg0mq@4ax.com... 
 > >> On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 03:51:16 +0000 (UTC), "Alan Jeffery" 
 > >>  wrote: 
 > >> 
 > >>  
 > >> 
 > >> >> > > > But notice the Second Law of Talk.Origins: 
 > >> >> > > > 
 > >> >> > > >       "The lamer the post, the bigger the resulting thread." 
 > >> >> > > 
 > >> >> > > Impossible! You can't get more information out than was put in 
 > >there 
 > >> >at 
 > >> >> > > the beginning. 
 > >> >> > 
 > >> >> > Reading for comprehension John.  He said _longer_ not more 
 > >informative. 
 > >> >> > 
 > >> >> 
 > >> >> But if it's longer it is more irreducibly complex. Information 
 cannot 
 > >be 
 > >> >> created (except by an unspecific omnicompetent designer about whom 
 we 
 > >> >> cna say nothing). 
 > >> > 
 > >> >So far I can't see anything even remotely complex in this thread. 
 > >> > 
 > >> 
 > >> Now that the original subject of the thread is completely changed, is 
 > >> this an example of sympatric speciation? 
 > >> 
 > >Please show me the transitional post. 
 > > 
 > 
 > If I did, you would just find two new gaps that needed transitional 
 > elements! 
  
 But it would still only be micro-change, not macro.  Silly evilutionist. 
  
 Alan Jeffery 
 > 
  
  
 --- 
 Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. 
 Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). 
 Version: 6.0.754 / Virus Database: 504 - Release Date: 6/09/2004 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)