XPost: talk.origins 
 From: rsn_@_comcast.net 
  
 On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 21:59:21 +0000 (UTC), "Alan Jeffery" 
  wrote: 
  
 > 
 >"r norman"  wrote in message 
 >news:0oodk0d46rf0j0jqng0hr6otngro5qg0mq@4ax.com... 
 >> On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 03:51:16 +0000 (UTC), "Alan Jeffery" 
 >>  wrote: 
 >> 
 >>  
 >> 
 >> >> > > > But notice the Second Law of Talk.Origins: 
 >> >> > > > 
 >> >> > > >       "The lamer the post, the bigger the resulting thread." 
 >> >> > > 
 >> >> > > Impossible! You can't get more information out than was put in 
 >there 
 >> >at 
 >> >> > > the beginning. 
 >> >> > 
 >> >> > Reading for comprehension John.  He said _longer_ not more 
 >informative. 
 >> >> > 
 >> >> 
 >> >> But if it's longer it is more irreducibly complex. Information cannot 
 >be 
 >> >> created (except by an unspecific omnicompetent designer about whom we 
 >> >> cna say nothing). 
 >> > 
 >> >So far I can't see anything even remotely complex in this thread. 
 >> > 
 >> 
 >> Now that the original subject of the thread is completely changed, is 
 >> this an example of sympatric speciation? 
 >> 
 >Please show me the transitional post. 
 > 
  
 If I did, you would just find two new gaps that needed transitional 
 elements! 
  
 --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 
  * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)